208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24512755)
1. Deformable versus rigid registration of PET/CT images for radiation treatment planning of head and neck and lung cancer patients: a retrospective dosimetric comparison.
Fortin D; Basran PS; Berrang T; Peterson D; Wai ES
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 9():50. PubMed ID: 24512755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Target and organ dose estimation from intensity modulated head and neck radiation therapy using 3 deformable image registration algorithms.
Kumarasiri A; Liu C; Siddiqui F; Zhong H; Chetty IJ; Kim J
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e317-25. PubMed ID: 25752720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional 3D staging PET/CT in CT simulation for lung cancer: impact of rigid and deformable target volume alignments for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Hanna GG; Van Sörnsen De Koste JR; Carson KJ; O'Sullivan JM; Hounsell AR; Senan S
Br J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 84(1006):919-29. PubMed ID: 21224293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is image registration of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for head-and-neck cancer treatment planning necessary?
Fried D; Lawrence M; Khandani AH; Rosenman J; Cullip T; Chera BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 22414285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515.
Bradley J; Bae K; Choi N; Forster K; Siegel BA; Brunetti J; Purdy J; Faria S; Vu T; Thorstad W; Choy H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):435-41.e1. PubMed ID: 21075551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity study of voxel-based PET image comparison to image registration algorithms.
Yip S; Chen AB; Aerts HJ; Berbeco R
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111714. PubMed ID: 25370628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accumulation of the delivered dose based on cone-beam CT and deformable image registration for non-small cell lung cancer treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Wang B; Wang DQ; Lin MS; Lu SP; Zhang J; Chen L; Li QW; Cheng ZK; Liu FJ; Guo JY; Liu H; Qiu B
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1112. PubMed ID: 33198676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open source deformable image registration system for treatment planning and recurrence CT scans : Validation in the head and neck region.
Zukauskaite R; Brink C; Hansen CR; Bertelsen A; Johansen J; Grau C; Eriksen JG
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Aug; 192(8):545-51. PubMed ID: 27323754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer with 18-fluor-fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography: adaptive thresholding method applied to primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes.
Perez-Romasanta LA; Bellon-Guardia M; Torres-Donaire J; Lozano-Martin E; Sanz-Martin M; Velasco-Jimenez J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2013 Apr; 15(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 22865325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/Computed Tomography (CT) acquired in a nontreatment position be accurately registered to a head-and-neck radiotherapy planning CT?
Hwang AB; Bacharach SL; Yom SS; Weinberg VK; Quivey JM; Franc BL; Xia P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 19084350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiotherapy planning: PET/CT scanner performances in the definition of gross tumour volume and clinical target volume.
Brianzoni E; Rossi G; Ancidei S; Berbellini A; Capoccetti F; Cidda C; D'Avenia P; Fattori S; Montini GC; Valentini G; Proietti A; Algranati C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Dec; 32(12):1392-9. PubMed ID: 16133395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of target volumes defined by deformable and rigid registration of diagnostic PET/CT to planning CT in primary esophageal cancer.
Guo Y; Li J; Zhang P; Shao Q; Xu M; Li Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(1):e5528. PubMed ID: 28072693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations.
Veiga C; McClelland J; Moinuddin S; Lourenço A; Ricketts K; Annkah J; Modat M; Ourselin S; D'Souza D; Royle G
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031703. PubMed ID: 24593707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Workflow and radiation safety implications of (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for radiotherapy planning.
Sam S; Shon IH; Vinod SK; Lin P; Lin M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 22582005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?
Biehl KJ; Kong FM; Dehdashti F; Jin JY; Mutic S; El Naqa I; Siegel BA; Bradley JD
J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1808-12. PubMed ID: 17079814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 4-dimensional computed tomography to 4-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography deformable image registration for lung cancer adaptive radiation therapy.
Balik S; Weiss E; Jan N; Roman N; Sleeman WC; Fatyga M; Christensen GE; Zhang C; Murphy MJ; Lu J; Keall P; Williamson JF; Hugo GD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jun; 86(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 23462422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Bradley J; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Miller TR; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Bosch W; Bertrand RJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 15093902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of rigid and deformable image registration for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy planning with diagnostic position PET/CT.
Kai Y; Arimura H; Toya R; Saito T; Matsuyama T; Fukugawa Y; Shiraishi S; Shimohigashi Y; Maruyama M; Oya N
Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 31834577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for estimating the site of origin of locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Due AK; Vogelius IR; Aznar MC; Bentzen SM; Berthelsen AK; Korreman SS; Kristensen CA; Specht L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2012 Aug; 188(8):671-6. PubMed ID: 22580623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for better target volume definition in radiation therapy planning.
Vila A; Sánchez-Reyes A; Conill C; Gispert JD; Trampal C; Láinez C; Vayreda J; Pedro A
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 May; 12(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 20466621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
