BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24512866)

  • 61. Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study.
    Hirko KA; Lennon SA; Lucas T; Miller DC; Jimbo M; Leibfritz SJ; Knoff SJ; Janney CA; Berg PD
    Am J Prev Med; 2020 Sep; 59(3):404-411. PubMed ID: 32684359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance among urban Hispanics.
    Gorin SS
    J Behav Med; 2005 Apr; 28(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 15957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Adherence to repeat fecal occult blood testing in an urban community health center network.
    Liss DT; Petit-Homme A; Feinglass J; Buchanan DR; Baker DW
    J Community Health; 2013 Oct; 38(5):829-33. PubMed ID: 23546555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Using a lay cancer screening navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening rates.
    Liu G; Perkins A
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 25748770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Promoting colorectal cancer screening in public health outreach campaigns.
    Schneider TR; Feufel MA; Berkel HJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):637-46. PubMed ID: 22235526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Impact of stopping sending colorectal cancer screening test kits by regular mail.
    Koïvogui A; Ecochard R; Le Mab G; Benamouzig R
    Public Health; 2019 Aug; 173():33-41. PubMed ID: 31252152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Colorectal cancer screening program : Test completion rate and follow-up results after selective mailing of the test kit, based on likelihood of participation].
    Koïvogui A; Vincelet C; Ait-Hadad H; Pellissier H; Valibay S; Kaufmanis A; Benamouzig R
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2021 Oct; 69(5):265-276. PubMed ID: 34344563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening.
    Myers RE; Bittner-Fagan H; Daskalakis C; Sifri R; Vernon SW; Cocroft J; Dicarlo M; Katurakes N; Andrel J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Jan; 22(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 23118143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Colorectal cancer screening program: cost effectiveness of systematic recall letters.
    Tifratene K; Eisinger F; Rinaldi Y; Didelot R; Seitz JF
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2007 Nov; 31(11):929-33. PubMed ID: 18166880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effectiveness of three interventions to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    López-Torres Hidalgo J; Rabanales Sotos J; Simarro Herráez MJ; López-Torres López J; Campos Rosa M; López Verdejo MÁ
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2016 Jun; 108(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 27055722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Preformulated implementation intentions to promote colorectal cancer screening: a cluster-randomized trial.
    Lo SH; Good A; Sheeran P; Baio G; Rainbow S; Vart G; von Wagner C; Wardle J
    Health Psychol; 2014 Sep; 33(9):998-1002. PubMed ID: 24245844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?
    Inadomi JM; Issaka RB; Green BB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Apr; 19(4):633-645. PubMed ID: 31887438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mail-out bowel cancer screening: Identifying the behavioural stumbling blocks.
    Myers L; Goodwin BC; Ireland M; March S; Aitken J
    Psychooncology; 2022 May; 31(5):816-823. PubMed ID: 34967054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Increasing compliance with colorectal cancer screening: the development of effective health education.
    Hart AR; Barone TL; Mayberry JF
    Health Educ Res; 1997 Jun; 12(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 10168571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening at Community-Based Primary Care Clinics in San Francisco.
    Marx R; Tse WM; Golden L; Johnson EC
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 25968085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Facilitators and Barriers of a Health Department-based Mailed Fecal Testing Program.
    Rhode J; James S; Wheeler SB; Baker D; Drechsel R; Faile L; Plescia M; Reuland DS; Wroth T; Brenner A
    N C Med J; 2020; 81(5):293-299. PubMed ID: 32900887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Colorectal Cancer Screening Challenges in West Virginia.
    W V Med J; 2015; 111(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 26665890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Laypersons' views of material incentives for enhancing colorectal cancer screening.
    Hagoel L; Rennert G; Feder-Bubis P
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1194-203. PubMed ID: 23745608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The quality improvement cycle (QIC) in clinical practice: colorectal cancer detection.
    Schoenbaum SC
    HMO Pract; 1989; 3(5):169-72. PubMed ID: 10296984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.