212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24513076)
1. [Comparison between the tooth length measured by cone-beam CT and the tooth length measured with vernier caliper].
Yang YQ; Mi ZL; Ge ZL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):689-93. PubMed ID: 24513076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.
Sherrard JF; Rossouw PE; Benson BW; Carrillo R; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S100-8. PubMed ID: 20381750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-depth morphological evaluation of tooth anatomic lengths with root canal configurations using cone beam computed tomography in North American population.
Kulkarni V; Duruel O; Ataman-Duruel ET; Tözüm MD; Nares S; Tözüm TF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190103. PubMed ID: 32049131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bolton tooth size ratio and its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study.
Alam MK; Shahid F; Purmal K; Ahmad B; Khamis MF
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1047-53. PubMed ID: 25220521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of three-dimensional root surface changes and resorption following rapid maxillary expansion: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.
Akyalcin S; Alexander SP; Silva RM; English JD
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1():117-26. PubMed ID: 25865540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study of buccal plate thickness of the maxillary and mandibular posterior dentition.
Temple KE; Schoolfield J; Noujeim ME; Huynh-Ba G; Lasho DJ; Mealey BL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1072-8. PubMed ID: 26364803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographic evaluation on the assessment of periapical bone destruction in dog's teeth.
Ordinola-Zapata R; Bramante CM; Duarte MH; Ramos Fernandes LM; Camargo EJ; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Vivan RR; Capelozza AL; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 21530334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tooth inclination in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
Fukagawa H; Motegi E; Fuma A; Nomura M; Kano M; Sueishi K; Okano S
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 20689237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.
Porto OCL; Silva BSF; Silva JA; Estrela CRA; Alencar AHG; Bueno MDR; Estrela C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190148. PubMed ID: 32049133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study.
Sharma S; Thakur SL; Joshi SK; Kulkarni SS
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 23355379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
