These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24513097)

  • 1. Reliability of 4 clinical grading systems for corneal staining.
    Sook Chun Y; Park IK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):1097-102. PubMed ID: 24513097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective assessment of corneal staining using digital image analysis.
    Chun YS; Yoon WB; Kim KG; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):7896-903. PubMed ID: 25406292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Corneal Fluorescein Staining Using a Novel Automated Method.
    Amparo F; Wang H; Yin J; Marmalidou A; Dana R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 May; 58(6):BIO168-BIO173. PubMed ID: 28693042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Grading System for Evaluation of Superficial Punctate Keratitis Associated With Dry Eye.
    Rodriguez JD; Lane KJ; Ousler GW; Angjeli E; Smith LM; Abelson MB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2340-7. PubMed ID: 26066593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective quantification of fluorescence intensity on the corneal surface using a modified slit-lamp technique.
    Tan B; Zhou Y; Svitova T; Lin MC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2013 May; 39(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 23629006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel grading method for superficial punctate keratopathy magnitude and its correlation with corneal epithelial permeability.
    Miyata K; Amano S; Sawa M; Nishida T
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Nov; 121(11):1537-9. PubMed ID: 14609908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers.
    Dundas M; Walker A; Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11220038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-grader Agreement of the Ocular Staining Score in the Sjögren's International Clinical Collaborative Alliance (SICCA) Registry.
    Rose-Nussbaumer J; Lietman TM; Shiboski CH; Shiboski SC; Bunya VY; Akpek EK; Srinivasan M; Mascarenhas J; Massaro-Giordano G; McNamara NA; Whitcher JP; Gaynor BD;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 160(6):1150-1153.e3. PubMed ID: 26302236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining.
    van der Worp E; de Brabander J; Swarbrick HA; Hendrikse F
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 19165124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating an impression cytology grading system (IC score) in patients with dry eye syndrome.
    Haller-Schober EM; Schwantzer G; Berghold A; Fischl M; Theisl A; Horwath-Winter J
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Aug; 20(8):927-33. PubMed ID: 16096658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal staining characteristics in limited zones compared with whole cornea documentation for the detection of dry eye subtypes.
    Fenner BJ; Tong L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Dec; 54(13):8013-9. PubMed ID: 24222306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.
    Brautaset RL; Nilsson M; Leach N; Miller WL; Gire A; Quintero S; Bergmanson JP
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Nov; 34(6):312-6. PubMed ID: 18997539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Katsara SS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11220037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.
    Piñero DP; Saenz González C; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 19101433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjunctival and corneal pneumatic sensitivity is associated with signs and symptoms of ocular dryness.
    Situ P; Simpson TL; Fonn D; Jones LW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 49(7):2971-6. PubMed ID: 18390645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between live and photographed slit lamp grading of corneal staining.
    Sorbara L; Peterson R; Schneider S; Woods C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25546827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective grading of the anterior eye.
    Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests.
    Bron AJ; Evans VE; Smith JA
    Cornea; 2003 Oct; 22(7):640-50. PubMed ID: 14508260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the efficacy of fluorescein, rose bengal, lissamine green, and a new dye mixture for ocular surface staining.
    Korb DR; Herman JP; Finnemore VM; Exford JM; Blackie CA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 18180687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tear osmolarity measurements in dry eye related to primary Sjögren's syndrome.
    Utine CA; Bıçakçıgil M; Yavuz S; Çiftçi F
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 Aug; 36(8):683-90. PubMed ID: 21780917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.