202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24513562)
1. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment.
Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Kinect Recording System for objective three- and four-dimensional breast assessment with image overlays.
Henseler H; Bonkat SK; Vogt PM; Rosenhahn B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):e27-34. PubMed ID: 26565080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor.
Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and assessment of a Microsoft Kinect based system for imaging the breast in three dimensions.
Wheat JS; Choppin S; Goyal A
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 24507690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging].
Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a portable 3D ultrasound imaging system for musculoskeletal tissues.
Huang QH; Zheng YP; Lu MH; Chi ZR
Ultrasonics; 2005 Jan; 43(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 15556650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging.
Szychta P; Raine C; Butterworth M; Stewart K; Witmanowski H; Zadrozny M; Rykala J
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jan; 44():136-43. PubMed ID: 24377697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast.
Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans.
Rogati G; Leardini A; Ortolani M; Caravaggi P
J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Mar; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 33731179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of the first and second generation Microsoft Kinect™ for identifying joint center locations during static postures.
Xu X; McGorry RW
Appl Ergon; 2015 Jul; 49():47-54. PubMed ID: 25766422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation.
Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty.
Azmy C; Guérard S; Bonnet X; Gabrielli F; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20170853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An intraoperative 3D ultrasound system for tumor margin determination in breast cancer surgery.
DeJean P; Brackstone M; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):564-70. PubMed ID: 20229864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
