These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24513562)
1. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Kinect Recording System for objective three- and four-dimensional breast assessment with image overlays. Henseler H; Bonkat SK; Vogt PM; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):e27-34. PubMed ID: 26565080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and assessment of a Microsoft Kinect based system for imaging the breast in three dimensions. Wheat JS; Choppin S; Goyal A Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 24507690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging]. Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a portable 3D ultrasound imaging system for musculoskeletal tissues. Huang QH; Zheng YP; Lu MH; Chi ZR Ultrasonics; 2005 Jan; 43(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 15556650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging. Szychta P; Raine C; Butterworth M; Stewart K; Witmanowski H; Zadrozny M; Rykala J Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jan; 44():136-43. PubMed ID: 24377697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans. Rogati G; Leardini A; Ortolani M; Caravaggi P J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Mar; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 33731179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of the first and second generation Microsoft Kinect™ for identifying joint center locations during static postures. Xu X; McGorry RW Appl Ergon; 2015 Jul; 49():47-54. PubMed ID: 25766422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty. Azmy C; Guérard S; Bonnet X; Gabrielli F; Skalli W Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20170853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An intraoperative 3D ultrasound system for tumor margin determination in breast cancer surgery. DeJean P; Brackstone M; Fenster A Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):564-70. PubMed ID: 20229864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]