352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24514619)
1. Performance evaluation of a 1.6-µm methane DIAL system from ground, aircraft and UAV platforms.
Refaat TF; Ismail S; Nehrir AR; Hair JW; Crawford JH; Leifer I; Shuman T
Opt Express; 2013 Dec; 21(25):30415-32. PubMed ID: 24514619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an airborne triple-pulsed 2 μm IPDA lidar for simultaneous and independent atmospheric water vapor and carbon dioxide measurements.
Refaat TF; Singh UN; Yu J; Petros M; Ismail S; Kavaya MJ; Davis KJ
Appl Opt; 2015 Feb; 54(6):1387-98. PubMed ID: 25968204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-range optical air data measurements for aircraft control using rotational Raman backscatter.
Fraczek M; Behrendt A; Schmitt N
Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(14):16398-414. PubMed ID: 23938491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous wave synthetic low-coherence wind sensing Lidar: motionless measurement system with subsequent numerical range scanning.
Brinkmeyer E; Waterholter T
Opt Express; 2013 Jan; 21(2):1872-97. PubMed ID: 23389172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New methods of data calibration for high power-aperture lidar.
Guan S; Yang G; Chang Q; Cheng X; Yang Y; Gong S; Wang J
Opt Express; 2013 Mar; 21(6):7768-85. PubMed ID: 23546158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Error reduction in retrievals of atmospheric species from symmetrically measured lidar sounding absorption spectra.
Chen JR; Numata K; Wu ST
Opt Express; 2014 Oct; 22(21):26055-75. PubMed ID: 25401639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of aerosol phase function and vertical backscattering coefficient using a charge-coupled device side-scatter lidar.
Tao Z; Liu D; Wang Z; Ma X; Zhang Q; Xie C; Bo G; Hu S; Wang Y
Opt Express; 2014 Jan; 22(1):1127-34. PubMed ID: 24515072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Airborne measurements of atmospheric methane column abundance using a pulsed integrated-path differential absorption lidar.
Riris H; Numata K; Li S; Wu S; Ramanathan A; Dawsey M; Mao J; Kawa R; Abshire JB
Appl Opt; 2012 Dec; 51(34):8296-305. PubMed ID: 23207402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-frequency differential absorption LIDAR system for remote sensing of CO
Wagner GA; Plusquellic DF
Opt Express; 2018 Jul; 26(15):19420-19434. PubMed ID: 30114114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First measurements of a carbon dioxide plume from an industrial source using a ground based mobile differential absorption lidar.
Robinson RA; Gardiner TD; Innocenti F; Finlayson A; Woods PT; Few JF
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1957-66. PubMed ID: 24933364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new eye-safe lidar design for studying atmospheric aerosol distributions.
Cao N; Zhou X; Li S; Chen Z
Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Mar; 80(3):035109. PubMed ID: 19334954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NASA multipurpose airborne DIAL system and measurements of ozone and aerosol profiles.
Browell EV; Carter AF; Shipley ST; Allen RJ; Butler CF; Mayo MN; Siviter JH; Hall WM
Appl Opt; 1983 Feb; 22(4):522-34. PubMed ID: 18195821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methane optical density measurements with an integrated path differential absorption lidar from an airborne platform.
Riris H; Numata K; Wu S; Gonzalez B; Rodriguez M; Scott S; Kawa S; Mao J
J Appl Remote Sens; 2017 Jul; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 29225719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double-pulse 2-μm integrated path differential absorption lidar airborne validation for atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement.
Refaat TF; Singh UN; Yu J; Petros M; Remus R; Ismail S
Appl Opt; 2016 May; 55(15):4232-46. PubMed ID: 27411155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Water vapor differential absorption lidar development and evaluation.
Browell EV; Wilkerson TD; McIlrath TJ
Appl Opt; 1979 Oct; 18(20):3474-83. PubMed ID: 20216627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atmospheric boundary layer CO
Cadiou E; Mammez D; Dherbecourt JB; Gorju G; Pelon J; Melkonian JM; Godard A; Raybaut M
Opt Lett; 2017 Oct; 42(20):4044-4047. PubMed ID: 29028008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fluorescence LIDAR sensor for hyper-spectral time-resolved remote sensing and mapping.
Palombi L; Alderighi D; Cecchi G; Raimondi V; Toci G; Lognoli D
Opt Express; 2013 Jun; 21(12):14736-46. PubMed ID: 23787661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-comparison of 2 microm Heterodyne Differential Absorption Lidar, Laser Diode Spectrometer, LICOR NDIR analyzer and flasks measurements of near-ground atmospheric CO2 mixing ratio.
Gibert F; Joly L; Xuéref-Rémy I; Schmidt M; Royer A; Flamant PH; Ramonet M; Parvitte B; Durry G; Zéninari V
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2009 Jan; 71(5):1914-21. PubMed ID: 18718810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infrared lidar overlap function: an experimental determination.
Guerrero-Rascado JL; Costa MJ; Bortoli D; Silva AM; Lyamani H; Alados-Arboledas L
Opt Express; 2010 Sep; 18(19):20350-9. PubMed ID: 20940927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tropospheric ozone differential-absorption lidar using stimulated Raman scattering in carbon dioxide.
Nakazato M; Nagai T; Sakai T; Hirose Y
Appl Opt; 2007 Apr; 46(12):2269-79. PubMed ID: 17415396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
