These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

775 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24516006)

  • 1. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Generally Efficient Targeted Minimum Loss Based Estimator based on the Highly Adaptive Lasso.
    van der Laan M
    Int J Biostat; 2017 Oct; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 29023235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal Inference for a Population of Causally Connected Units.
    van der Laan MJ
    J Causal Inference; 2014 Mar; 2(1):13-74. PubMed ID: 26180755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.
    Ju C; Wyss R; Franklin JM; Schneeweiss S; Häggström J; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1044-1063. PubMed ID: 29226777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scalable collaborative targeted learning for high-dimensional data.
    Ju C; Gruber S; Lendle SD; Chambaz A; Franklin JM; Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):532-554. PubMed ID: 28936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):131-55. PubMed ID: 27227720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
    Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators.
    Williamson EJ; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1617-32. PubMed ID: 22362427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An application of collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation in causal inference and genomics.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 18. PubMed ID: 21731530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
    Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators.
    Porter KE; Gruber S; van der Laan MJ; Sekhon JS
    Int J Biostat; 2011; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 21931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.