These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24516095)

  • 1. Standard of care and resource implications of the Cuthbertson v. Rasouli ruling.
    Sibbald R; Chidwick P; Hawryluck L
    CMAJ; 2014 Mar; 186(5):327-8. PubMed ID: 24516095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of decision-making in critical care after Cuthbertson v. Rasouli.
    Hawryluck L; Baker AJ; Faith A; Singh JM
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):951-8. PubMed ID: 25164242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Withholding and withdrawing treatment in Canada: implications of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the Rasouli case.
    Downar J; Sibbald RW; Bailey TM; Kavanagh BP
    CMAJ; 2014 Nov; 186(16):E622-6. PubMed ID: 24958840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Standardization Approach in End-of-Life Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment: Sacrificing Patient's Safety and the Quality of Care.
    Rady MY; Verheijde JL
    J Intensive Care Med; 2016 May; 31(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 25835021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In defence of consent and capacity boards for end-of-life care.
    Downie J; Hadskis M
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 25156909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The withdrawal of treatment is still treatment.
    Zivot JB
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):895-8. PubMed ID: 25091296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doctors can withdraw life support from baby with rare genetic disorder, says judge.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1857. PubMed ID: 28404549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Issues of Vulnerability and Equality: The Emerging Need for Court Evaluations of Physicians' Fiduciary Duties in High Stakes End-of-Life Decisions.
    Hawryluck L
    Health Law Can; 2017 May; 37(4):86-95. PubMed ID: 29996028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supreme Court ruling on the withdrawal of life-sustaining nutrition.
    Griffith R
    Br J Nurs; 2018 Sep; 27(17):1016-1017. PubMed ID: 30235033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Special ethical issues in the management of PVS patients.
    Brody B
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 1630136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Position statement on laws and regulations concerning life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, for patients lacking decision-making capacity.
    Kothare SV; Altman AM; Rodriguez IN
    Neurology; 2008 Jan; 70(3):242; author reply 242-3. PubMed ID: 18195272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists.
    Cape D; Fox-Robichaud A; Turgeon AF; Seely A; Hall R; Burns K; Singal RK; Dodek P; Bagshaw S; Sibbald R; Downar J
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Mar; 42(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26621856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical analysis and the facts.
    Paris JJ; Keenan J; Kavanaugh JF
    America (NY); 2003 Dec 22-29; 189(21):15. PubMed ID: 15069973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dissenting opinion, Bush v. Schiavo, 885 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2004).
    Marks TC
    Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 17100000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heriberto Duarte Sr. v. Chino Community Hospital.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 2
    Wests Calif Report; 1999; 85():521-7. PubMed ID: 12769118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court lets right-to-die ruling stand: parents at odds with husband over removing Fla. woman's feeding tube.
    Roig-Franiza M
    Washington Post; 2005 Jan; ():A7. PubMed ID: 15709259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Law's effect on the quality of end-of-life care: lessons from the Schiavo case.
    Burt RA
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Nov; 34(11 Suppl):S348-54. PubMed ID: 17057597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal developments in end-of-life issues.
    Jarvis D
    Healthc Q; 2014; 17(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 25191809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: The Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.
    ; Bandrauk N; Downar J; Paunovic B
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jan; 65(1):105-122. PubMed ID: 29150778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [To maintain or to withdraw life support? Variations on the methods of ending life in a pediatric intensive care unit over a period of 6 years].
    Vernaz S; Casanova L; Blanc F; Lebel S; Ughetto F; Paut O
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2014 Jun; 33(6):400-4. PubMed ID: 24907188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.