These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24516517)

  • 1. Vocal behavior of the elusive purple frog of India (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis), a fossorial species endemic to the Western Ghats.
    Thomas A; Suyesh R; Biju SD; Bee MA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e84809. PubMed ID: 24516517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Acoustic Analysis of the Genus Microhyla (Anura: Microhylidae) of Sri Lanka.
    Wijayathilaka N; Meegaskumbura M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159003. PubMed ID: 27403744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)].
    Wei L; Shao WW; Lin ZH
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Feb; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23389973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vocal repertoire of
    Srigyan M; Samad A; Singh A; Karan J; Chandra A; Sinha PG; Kumar V; Das S; Thomas A; Suyesh R
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16903. PubMed ID: 38562993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei).
    Pettitt BA; Bourne GR; Bee MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4811-20. PubMed ID: 22712952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
    Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes.
    Wilczynski W; Keddy-Hector AC; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 39(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 1633554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neglecting the call of the wild: Captive frogs like the sound of their own voice.
    Passos LF; Garcia G; Young RJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181931. PubMed ID: 28732034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coexisting good neighbours: acoustic and calling microhabitat niche partitioning in two elusive syntopic species of balloon frogs, Uperodon systoma and U. globulosus (Anura: Microhylidae) and potential of individual vocal signatures.
    Prasad VK; Chuang MF; Das A; Ramesh K; Yi Y; Dinesh KP; Borzée A
    BMC Zool; 2022 May; 7(1):27. PubMed ID: 37170156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
    Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae).
    Hepp F; Pombal JPJ
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jan; 4725(1):zootaxa.4725.1.1. PubMed ID: 32230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice.
    Köhler J; Jansen M; Rodríguez A; Kok PJR; Toledo LF; Emmrich M; Glaw F; Haddad CFB; Rödel MO; Vences M
    Zootaxa; 2017 Apr; 4251(1):1-124. PubMed ID: 28609991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vocalizations of female frogs contain nonlinear characteristics and individual signatures.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Feng AS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174815. PubMed ID: 28358859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry.
    Keddy-Hector AC; Wilczynski W; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 39(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 1633555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
    Penna M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testosterone levels and evoked vocal responses in a natural population of the frog Batrachyla taeniata.
    Solís R; Penna M
    Horm Behav; 1997 Apr; 31(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9154430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical calls: Circadian and seasonal periodicity in vocal activity in a breeding colony of Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki).
    Zigler A; Straw S; Tokuda I; Bronson E; Riede T
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0286582. PubMed ID: 37590183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.