These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24516990)

  • 1. The rabbit gingival tissue response to retraction liquids and tetrahydrozoline.
    Kostić I; Mihailović D; Najman S; Stojanović S; Kostić M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 24516990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival tissue inflammatory response following treatment with chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs.
    Kopac I; Cvetko E; Pavlica Z; Marion L
    Pflugers Arch; 2001; 442(6 Suppl 1):R145-6. PubMed ID: 11678316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs.
    Kopac I; Cvetko E; Marion L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11887594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
    Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The retractive effects of different gingival retraction agents].
    Feng YZ; Zeng XH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 21427901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents.
    Bowles WH; Tardy SJ; Vahadi A
    J Dent Res; 1991 Nov; 70(11):1447-9. PubMed ID: 1960257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue.
    Akca EA; Yildirim E; Dalkiz M; Yavuzyilmaz H; Beydemir B
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16429704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts.
    Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Choromanska A; Raszewski Z
    Folia Biol (Praha); 2012; 58(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22464823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.
    Chaudhari J; Prajapati P; Patel J; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26097353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Aluminum Chloride Retraction Cords, Expasyl, and Tetrahydrozoline-Soaked Retraction Systems in Gingival Retraction.
    Kavita K; Sinha RI; Singh R; Singh R; Reddy KRP; Kulkarni G
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S440-S443. PubMed ID: 33149502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
    Csillag M; Nyiri G; Vag J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17280885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electron microscopic analysis of the effects of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes.
    Kopac I; Sterle M; Marion L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 11807484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of alpha-adrenomimetic agents for gingival retraction: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
    Mehra N; Rathi A; Sharma R; Kaushik M; Sood T
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):533-537. PubMed ID: 33088060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viability of fibroblasts in cell culture after treatment with different chemical retraction agents.
    Kopac I; Batista U; Cvetko E; Marion L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11844038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.
    Igic M; Kostic M; Basic J; Krunic N; Pejcic A; Gligorijevic N; Milic Lemic A
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):492-498. PubMed ID: 32241014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of gingival inflammation related to different retraction agents].
    Sun XW; Sun GL; Xiao LJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 18357884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of retraction agents on cytoskeleton reorganization and oxidative stress in primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).
    Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Bieżuńska-Kusiak K; Choromańska A; Dubińska-Magiera M; Ziętek M; Kulbacka J
    Arch Oral Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 24581858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epinephrine penetrates through gingival sulcus unlike keratinized gingiva and evokes remote vasoconstriction in human.
    Vág J; Gánti B; Mikecs B; Szabó E; Molnár B; Lohinai Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):305. PubMed ID: 33148235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.