These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24518098)

  • 1. Emerging evidence of a clinical quality registry as a driver of improvement in lung cancer outcomes.
    Stirling RG; Evans SM; McNeil JJ
    J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9(3):e28. PubMed ID: 24518098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nationwide quality improvement in lung cancer care: the role of the Danish Lung Cancer Group and Registry.
    Jakobsen E; Green A; Oesterlind K; Rasmussen TR; Iachina M; Palshof T
    J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Oct; 8(10):1238-47. PubMed ID: 24457234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice improvement requires more than guidelines and quality measures.
    Sigsbee B; Bever CT; Jones LK
    Neurology; 2016 Jan; 86(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 26519541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Rational tumour documentation and quality assurance to improve the standard of medical care for lung cancer patients].
    Blum T; Schönfeld N; Kollmeier J; Ammenwerth W; Delis S; Grüning W; Nehls W; Thiel S; Bauer TT
    Pneumologie; 2012 Apr; 66(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 22477483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review article: Use of renal registry data for research, health-care planning and quality improvement: what can we learn from registry data in the Asia-Pacific region?
    Lim TO; Goh A; Lim YN; Morad Z
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2008 Dec; 13(8):745-52. PubMed ID: 19154324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Policies to foster quality improvement registries: lessons from the Swedish case.
    Levay C
    J Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 279(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 26435356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care.
    Wilcox N; McNeil JJ
    Med J Aust; 2016 Nov; 205(10):S27-S29. PubMed ID: 27852198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of medical data registries.
    Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1191. PubMed ID: 25444071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The AAN and the triple aim.
    Franklin GM; Busis NA
    Neurology; 2016 Jan; 86(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 26519544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality registries: exciting opportunities.
    Ludvigsson JF
    J Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 279(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 26785951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in the outpatient setting: the IMPROVE HF performance improvement registry.
    Fonarow GC; Yancy CW; Albert NM; Curtis AB; Stough WG; Gheorghiade M; Heywood JT; Mehra M; O'Connor CM; Reynolds D; Walsh MN
    Am Heart J; 2007 Jul; 154(1):12-38. PubMed ID: 17584548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should all cases of lung cancer be presented at Tumor Board Conferences?
    Riquet M; Mordant P; Henni M; Wermert D; Fabre-Guillevin E; Cazes A; Le Pimpec Barthes F
    Thorac Surg Clin; 2013 May; 23(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 23566964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data quality in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke): results from a national data validation audit.
    Xian Y; Fonarow GC; Reeves MJ; Webb LE; Blevins J; Demyanenko VS; Zhao X; Olson DM; Hernandez AF; Peterson ED; Schwamm LH; Smith EE
    Am Heart J; 2012 Mar; 163(3):392-8, 398.e1. PubMed ID: 22424009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ICDs, guidelines, and national registries: opportunities to enhance quality of patient care.
    Singh JP; Ellenbogen KA; Desai NR; McAlister FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Mar; 35(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 22268567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leveraging state cancer registries to measure and improve the quality of cancer care: a potential strategy for California and beyond.
    Hiatt RA; Tai CG; Blayney DW; Deapen D; Hogarth M; Kizer KW; Lipscomb J; Malin J; Phillips SK; Santa J; Schrag D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Mar; 107(5):. PubMed ID: 25766400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operating principles for running a clinical quality registry: are they feasible?
    Ogilvy M; Kollias J
    ANZ J Surg; 2012 Nov; 82(11):832-7. PubMed ID: 22943307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why 'quality' care is dangerous.
    Groopman J; Hartzband P
    Mo Med; 2009; 106(3):174-5. PubMed ID: 22641911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Project, logistics and methodology of the National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome(PL-ACS)].
    Gierlotka M; Gasior M; Poloński L; Piekarski M; Kamiński M
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 May; 62 Suppl 1():I13-21. PubMed ID: 19810336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaps in optimal care for lung cancer.
    Vinod SK; O'Connell DL; Simonella L; Delaney GP; Boyer M; Peters M; Miller D; Supramaniam R; McCawley L; Armstrong B
    J Thorac Oncol; 2008 Aug; 3(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18670305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.
    Edwards BK; Brown ML; Wingo PA; Howe HL; Ward E; Ries LA; Schrag D; Jamison PM; Jemal A; Wu XC; Friedman C; Harlan L; Warren J; Anderson RN; Pickle LW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Oct; 97(19):1407-27. PubMed ID: 16204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.