These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24518583)

  • 1. Snijders's correction of Infit and Outfit indexes with estimated ability level: an analysis with the Rasch model.
    Magis D; Beland S; Raiche G
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24518583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
    Smith RM; Plackner C
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
    Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the Bootstrap Method to Evaluate the Critical Range of Misfit for Polytomous Rasch Fit Statistics.
    Seol H
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Jun; 118(3):937-56. PubMed ID: 27207735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Examination of Sensitivity to Measurement Error in Rasch Residual-based Fit Statistics.
    Padgett RN; Morgan GB
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(4):354-366. PubMed ID: 31730543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting measurement disturbance effects: the graphical display of item characteristics.
    Schumacker RE
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 25562337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corrected Rasch asymptotic standard errors for person ability estimates.
    Smith RM
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 9803720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
    Magis D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computing confidence intervals of item fit statistics in the family of Rasch models using the bootstrap method.
    Su YH; Sheu CF; Wang WC
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 17440261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fitting Rasch model using appropriateness measure statistics.
    López Pina JA; Hidalgo Montesinos MD
    Span J Psychol; 2005 May; 8(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 15875462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.
    Karabatsos G
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 12029176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goodness of fit of the items used in the 2nd cycle of evaluation and accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation based on the Rasch model.
    Lim MS; Huh S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():28. PubMed ID: 31614405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-sectional validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening (DESC) in a mixed sample of patients with mental and somatic diseases.
    Vehren T; Boecker M; Norra C; Wirtz M; Gauggel S; Forkmann T
    Compr Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 54(7):1082-9. PubMed ID: 23751247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymptotically Normally Distributed Person Fit Indices for Detecting Spuriously High Scores on Difficult Items.
    Xia Y; Zheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):343-358. PubMed ID: 30034053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality on Type I and Type II Error Rates using the Q-Index Item Fit Statistic for the Rasch Model.
    Estrada S
    J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(4):496-514. PubMed ID: 33989202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23442324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.