These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24518702)

  • 1. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding.
    Kom G; Tiedeu A; Kom M
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jan; 37(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16487954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
    Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
    Jebamony J; Jacob D
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cost-sensitive Bayesian combiner for reducing false positives in mammographic mass detection.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Feb; 64(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 29055935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dual stage adaptive thresholding (DuSAT) for automatic mass detection in mammograms.
    Anitha J; Dinesh Peter J; Immanuel Alex Pandian S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():93-104. PubMed ID: 27886719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu's N thresholding.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 May; 114(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 24681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A bilateral analysis scheme for false positive reduction in mammogram mass detection.
    Li Y; Chen H; Yang Y; Cheng L; Cao L
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Feb; 57():84-95. PubMed ID: 25544726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.