These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24518762)
21. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer. Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance. Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy. Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Hoeks CM; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Roobol MJ; Bul M; Hambrock T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24220253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy. Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Pennisi M J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):774-778. PubMed ID: 29679618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate. Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Second Opinion May Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Time to Improve Radiologists' Training Program? Luzzago S; Petralia G; Musi G; Catellani M; Alessi S; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Serino A; Conti A; Pricolo P; Nazzani S; Mirone V; Matei DV; Montanari E; de Cobelli O Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30527286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI. Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MR-guided prostate biopsy for planning of focal salvage after radiation therapy. Ménard C; Iupati D; Publicover J; Lee J; Abed J; O'Leary G; Simeonov A; Foltz WD; Milosevic M; Catton C; Morton G; Bristow R; Bayley A; Atenafu EG; Evans AJ; Jaffray DA; Chung P; Brock KK; Haider MA Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 25203127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection. Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Hamoen EHJ; de Rooij M; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 25466942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol. Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care? Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Javali TD; Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Jagannathan NR; Thulkar S; Dinda AK Int J Urol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23980749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer. Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score. Osses DF; van Asten JJ; Kieft GJ; Tijsterman JD World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 27287889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy. Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]