BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24518778)

  • 1. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Adam M; Hannah A; Budäus L; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Haese A; Fisch M; Wittmer C; Steurer S; Minner S; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Isbarn H
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 24518778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Servoll E; Saeter T; Vlatkovic L; Lund T; Nesland J; Waaler G; Axcrona K; Beisland HO
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 21933333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival].
    Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F
    Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy.
    Ranaweera M; Samaratunga H; Duffy D; Klopfer K; Brunelli M; Martignoni G; Delahunt B
    Pathology; 2011 Dec; 43(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 22002115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 influence the risk of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer?
    Servoll E; Saeter T; Vlatkovic L; Nesland J; Waaler G; Beisland HO
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2010 Sep; 44(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 20367396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
    Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases.
    Kates M; Sopko NA; Han M; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26264998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
    Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6).
    Kulkarni JN; Valsangkar RS; Jadhav YR; Singh DP
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 22269410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
    Sved PD; Gomez P; Manoharan M; Kim SS; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 15201746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.