173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24519964)
1. Development and implementation of PROgmatic: A clinical trial management system for pragmatic multi-centre trials, optimised for electronic data capture and patient-reported outcomes.
Cramon P; Rasmussen ÅK; Bonnema SJ; Bjorner JB; Feldt-Rasmussen U; Groenvold M; Hegedüs L; Watt T
Clin Trials; 2014 Jun; 11(3):344-354. PubMed ID: 24519964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems.
Palmer JA; Mor V; Volandes AE; McCreedy E; Loomer L; Carter P; Dvorchak F; Mitchell SL
Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):453. PubMed ID: 30134976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A web-based clinical trial management system for a sham-controlled multicenter clinical trial in depression.
Durkalski V; Wenle Zhao ; Dillon C; Kim J
Clin Trials; 2010 Apr; 7(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 20083496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care): Multicenter Pragmatic Nonrandomized Trial.
Girgis A; Durcinoska I; Arnold A; Descallar J; Kaadan N; Koh ES; Miller A; Ng W; Carolan M; Della-Fiorentina SA; Avery S; Delaney GP
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e19685. PubMed ID: 33118954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-reported outcomes and target effect sizes in pragmatic randomized trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional analysis.
Vanderhout S; Fergusson DA; Cook JA; Taljaard M
PLoS Med; 2022 Feb; 19(2):e1003896. PubMed ID: 35134080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Alerts in Clinical Trials: A Cross Sectional Survey.
Kyte D; Ives J; Draper H; Calvert M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144658. PubMed ID: 26785084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usability Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Survivors of Critical Illness.
Cox CE; Wysham NG; Kamal AH; Jones DM; Cass B; Tobin M; White DB; Kahn JM; Hough CL; Carson SS
Am J Crit Care; 2016 Jul; 25(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 27369033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.
Ellenberg SS; Culbertson R; Gillen DL; Goodman S; Schrandt S; Zirkle M
Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 26374679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.
Girgis A; Durcinoska I; Levesque JV; Gerges M; Sandell T; Arnold A; Delaney GP;
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e330. PubMed ID: 28970188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.
Basch E; Barbera L; Kerrigan CL; Velikova G
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2018 May; 38():122-134. PubMed ID: 30231381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An eClinical trial system for cancer that integrates with clinical pathways and electronic medical records.
Yamamoto K; Yamanaka K; Hatano E; Sumi E; Ishii T; Taura K; Iguchi K; Teramukai S; Yokode M; Uemoto S; Fukushima M
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):408-17. PubMed ID: 22605791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.
Johnson KE; Neta G; Dember LM; Coronado GD; Suls J; Chambers DA; Rundell S; Smith DH; Liu B; Taplin S; Stoney CM; Farrell MM; Glasgow RE
Trials; 2016 Jan; 17():32. PubMed ID: 26772801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iterative development and pilot testing of an intervention fidelity monitoring plan for the enhanced, electronic health record-facilitated pragmatic clinical trial: Implications for training and protocol integrity.
Chlan LL; Ridgeway JL; Tofthagen CS; Hamann BR; Mele KE; Dozois D; Ness SM; Peterson LJ
Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2021 Dec; 24():100868. PubMed ID: 34869939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Could phase 3 medicine trials be tagged as pragmatic? A case study: The Salford COPD trial.
Dal-Ré R
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Feb; 24(1):258-261. PubMed ID: 28685913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pivot/Remote: a distributed database for remote data entry in multi-center clinical trials.
Higgins SB; Jiang K; Plummer WD; Edens TR; Stroud MJ; Swindell BB; Wheeler AP; Bernard GR
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1097. PubMed ID: 8591379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementing a low-cost web-based clinical trial management system for community studies: a case study.
Geyer J; Myers K; Vander Stoep A; McCarty C; Palmer N; DeSalvo A
Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):634-44. PubMed ID: 21813582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.
Zeliadt SB; Coggeshall S; Thomas E; Gelman H; Taylor SL
Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):351-359. PubMed ID: 32522024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management.
Meinecke AK; Welsing P; Kafatos G; Burke D; Trelle S; Kubin M; Nachbaur G; Egger M; Zuidgeest M;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():13-22. PubMed ID: 28716504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
