BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24520825)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of clinician ECG interpretation for athletes.
    Magee C; Kazman J; Haigney M; Oriscello R; DeZee KJ; Deuster P; Depenbrock P; O'Connor FG
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2014 Jul; 19(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 24520825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the 2010 European Society of Cardiology criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.
    Weiner RB; Hutter AM; Wang F; Kim JH; Wood MJ; Wang TJ; Picard MH; Baggish AL
    Heart; 2011 Oct; 97(19):1573-7. PubMed ID: 21602522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-Rater Reliability and Downstream Financial Implications of Electrocardiography Screening in Young Athletes.
    Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Yeo TJ; Ster IC; Gabus V; Steriotis A; Dores H; Mellor G; García-Corrales C; Ensam B; Jayalapan V; Ezzat VA; Finocchiaro G; Gati S; Papadakis M; Tome-Esteban M; Sharma S
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Aug; 10(8):e003306. PubMed ID: 28808091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the 2017 international recommendations for clinicians who interpret adolescent athletes' ECGs: a cohort study of 11 168 British white and black soccer players.
    Malhotra A; Dhutia H; Yeo TJ; Finocchiaro G; Gati S; Bulleros P; Fanton Z; Papatheodorou E; Miles C; Keteepe-Arachi T; Basu J; Parry-Williams G; Prakash K; Gray B; D'Silva A; Ensam B; Behr E; Tome M; Papadakis M; Sharma S
    Br J Sports Med; 2020 Jun; 54(12):739-745. PubMed ID: 31278087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of an electrocardiogram workflow model for athletic cardiovascular screening: Primary care network versus sports cardiology interpretation.
    Williamson MD; Grubic N; Moulson N; Johri AM
    J Electrocardiol; 2023; 81():36-40. PubMed ID: 37517199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: the impact of using standised ECG criteria.
    Drezner JA; Asif IM; Owens DS; Prutkin JM; Salerno JC; Fean R; Rao AL; Stout K; Harmon KG
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 46(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 22310648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiogram interpretation in college athletes: Local institution versus sports cardiology center interpretation.
    Petek BJ; Drezner JA; Prutkin JM; Owens DS; Tran T; Harmon KG
    J Electrocardiol; 2020; 62():49-56. PubMed ID: 32814150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy and Bayesian analysis of new international ECG recommendations in paediatric athletes.
    McClean G; Riding NR; Pieles G; Watt V; Adamuz C; Sharma S; George KP; Oxborough D; Wilson MG
    Heart; 2019 Jan; 105(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 30228247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes.
    Riding NR; Sheikh N; Adamuz C; Watt V; Farooq A; Whyte GP; George KP; Drezner JA; Sharma S; Wilson MG
    Heart; 2015 Mar; 101(5):384-90. PubMed ID: 25502812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom.
    Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Gabus V; Merghani A; Finocchiaro G; Millar L; Narain R; Papadakis M; Naci H; Tome M; Sharma S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 27515329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs and yield of a 15-month preparticipation cardiovascular examination with ECG in 1070 young athletes in Switzerland: implications for routine ECG screening.
    Menafoglio A; Di Valentino M; Segatto JM; Siragusa P; Pezzoli R; Maggi M; Romano GA; Moschovitis G; Wilhelm M; Gallino A
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1157-61. PubMed ID: 24505042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-observer agreement in athletes ECG interpretation using the recent international recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes among observers with different levels of expertise.
    Schneiter S; Trachsel LD; Perrin T; Albrecht S; Pirrello T; Eser P; Gojanovic B; Menafoglio A; Wilhelm M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206072. PubMed ID: 30462649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addition of the electrocardiogram to the preparticipation examination of college athletes.
    Le VV; Wheeler MT; Mandic S; Dewey F; Fonda H; Perez M; Sungar G; Garza D; Ashley EA; Matheson G; Froelicher V
    Clin J Sport Med; 2010 Mar; 20(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 20215891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Limb-lead Electrocardiogram to the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram for Identifying Conditions Associated with Sudden Cardiac Death in Youth Athletes.
    Le HM; Downey BC; Lanois CJ; Miller PE; Stein CJ; Kerkhof DL; Corrado GD
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 152():146-149. PubMed ID: 34237610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal Screening Methods to Detect Cardiac Disorders in Athletes: An Evidence-Based Review.
    Winkelmann ZK; Crossway AK
    J Athl Train; 2017 Dec; 52(12):1168-1170. PubMed ID: 29154691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram-based screening protocols.
    Berte B; Duytschaever M; Elices J; Kataria V; Timmers L; Van Heuverswyn F; Stroobandt R; De Neve J; Watteyne K; Vandensteen E; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R
    Europace; 2015 Sep; 17(9):1435-40. PubMed ID: 25662983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardised criteria improve accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: a randomised controlled trial.
    Exeter DJ; Elley CR; Fulcher ML; Lee AC; Drezner JA; Asif IM
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1167-71. PubMed ID: 24659510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modest agreement in ECG interpretation limits the application of ECG screening in young athletes.
    Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kumar S; Lo W; Kalman J; Prior D
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jan; 12(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 25285648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes.
    Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kalman J; Lo W; Fallon K; MacIsaac A; Prior D
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23813487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.
    Hyde N; Prutkin JM; Drezner JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 56():81-84. PubMed ID: 31326858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.