582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24521965)
1. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Christ T; Grubitzsch H; Claus B; Konertz W
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 23158257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is early antithrombotic therapy necessary in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves in normal sinus rhythm?
ElBardissi AW; DiBardino DJ; Chen FY; Yamashita MH; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 20303508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement: contemporary analysis of a large, single-center series of 170 cases.
Chen XJ; Smith PB; Jaggers J; Lodge AJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 146(6):1461-6. PubMed ID: 23122698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study.
Du DT; McKean S; Kelman JA; Laschinger J; Johnson C; Warnock R; Worrall CM; Sedrakyan A; Encinosa W; MaCurdy TE; Izurieta HS
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 174(11):1788-95. PubMed ID: 25221895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of Carbomedics Top Hat valve with a robust follow-up system.
Senanayake EL; Howell NJ; Pagano D; Ray D; Mascaro J; Rooney SJ; Wilson IC; Graham TR
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Jan; 23(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 24763717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: 17 years' results.
Gansera B; Hapfelmeier A; Brandl K; Spiliopoulos K; Gundling F; Eichinger W
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 62(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 23817772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
