These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24522087)

  • 21. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women.
    Bedogni G; Agosti F; De Col A; Marazzi N; Tagliaferri A; Sartorio A
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Nov; 67(11):1129-32. PubMed ID: 24022260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Which alternative method to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in overweight and obese adolescents?].
    Lazzer S; Boirie Y; Meyer M; Vermorel M
    Arch Pediatr; 2005 Jul; 12(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 15964524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy men and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry].
    Freitas Júnior IF; Rupp de Paiva SA; de Godoy I; Smaili Santos SM; Campana AO
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2005 Jun; 55(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16335221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Body composition in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia predicted from bioelectric impedance and anthropometric variables: comparison with a reference dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Bott L; Béghin L; Gondon E; Hankard R; Pierrat V; Gottrand F
    Clin Nutr; 2006 Oct; 25(5):810-5. PubMed ID: 16678309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis: a valuable tool for the measurement of body composition in children.
    Tyrrell VJ; Richards G; Hofman P; Gillies GF; Robinson E; Cutfield WS
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 11410831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-calibration of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with eight-point tactile electrodes and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in healthy children aged 6-18 years.
    Lim JS; Hwang JS; Lee JA; Kim DH; Park KD; Jeong JS; Cheon GJ
    Pediatr Int; 2009 Apr; 51(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 19405930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Body composition analysis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of 3 methods: dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold measurements].
    Beaumesnil M; Chaillou E; Wagner AC; Rouquette A; Audran M; Giniès JL
    Arch Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 18(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 21397465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lower-limb and whole-body tissue composition assessment in healthy active older women.
    Rance M; Morio B; Courteix D; Bedu M; Van Praagh E; Duché P
    Ann Hum Biol; 2006; 33(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 16500814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of body composition in chronic renal failure: comparison of skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Woodrow G; Oldroyd B; Smith MA; Turney JH
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 May; 50(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 8735310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurement of body composition by DXA, BIA, Leg-to-leg BIA and near-infrared spectroscopy in breast cancer patients - comparison of the four methods.
    Klement RJ; Joos FT; Reuss-Borst MA; Kämmerer U
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2023 Apr; 54():443-452. PubMed ID: 36963892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of different body composition measurements in severely obese patients in the clinical setting.
    Ballesteros-Pomar MD; Calleja-Fernández A; Diez-Rodríguez R; Vidal-Casariego A; Blanco-Suárez MD; Cano-Rodríguez I
    Nutr Hosp; 2012; 27(5):1626-30. PubMed ID: 23478715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate body composition in heart failure.
    Alves FD; Souza GC; Biolo A; Clausell N
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Dec; 27(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 24684316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women.
    Braulio VB; Furtado VC; Silveira Md; Fonseca MH; Oliveira JE
    Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2010 Jun; 54(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20625652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concordance between Body Composition Indices Measured with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Obese Children in Sri Lanka.
    de Silva MHAD; Hewawasam RP; Lekamwasam S
    Int J Pediatr; 2021; 2021():6638057. PubMed ID: 33628278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-mode bioelectrical impedance analysis in a standing position for estimating fat-free mass validated against dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Huang AC; Chen YY; Chuang CL; Chiang LM; Lu HK; Lin HC; Chen KT; Hsiao AC; Hsieh KC
    Nutr Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):982-9. PubMed ID: 26409342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Group and individual agreement between field and dual X-ray absorptiometry-based body composition techniques in children from standard schools and a sports academy.
    Gerasimidis K; Shepherd S; Rashid R; Edwards CA; Ahmed F
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 Jan; 114(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24021735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Agreement of bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to estimate changes in body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention.
    Pietiläinen KH; Kaye S; Karmi A; Suojanen L; Rissanen A; Virtanen KA
    Br J Nutr; 2013 May; 109(10):1910-6. PubMed ID: 22935366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two bioelectrical impedance analyzers to measure body fat percentage and fat-free mass index in a group of Mexican young women.
    Velazquez-Alva Mdel C; Irigoyen-Camacho ME; Huerta-Huerta R; Delgadillo-Velazquez J
    Nutr Hosp; 2014 May; 29(5):1038-46. PubMed ID: 24951983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Precision and reliability of strength (Jamar vs. Biodex handgrip) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vs. bioimpedance analysis) measurements in advanced cancer patients.
    Trutschnigg B; Kilgour RD; Reinglas J; Rosenthall L; Hornby L; Morais JA; Vigano A
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2008 Dec; 33(6):1232-9. PubMed ID: 19088782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of three methods to assess body composition.
    Tewari N; Awad S; Macdonald IA; Lobo DN
    Nutrition; 2018 Mar; 47():1-5. PubMed ID: 29429527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.