BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24523352)

  • 1. Strain/species identification in metagenomes using genome-specific markers.
    Tu Q; He Z; Zhou J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(8):e67. PubMed ID: 24523352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strainberry: automated strain separation in low-complexity metagenomes using long reads.
    Vicedomini R; Quince C; Darling AE; Chikhi R
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4485. PubMed ID: 34301928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profiling microbial strains in urban environments using metagenomic sequencing data.
    Zolfo M; Asnicar F; Manghi P; Pasolli E; Tett A; Segata N
    Biol Direct; 2018 May; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 29743119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovering Individual Genomes from Metagenomes Using MaxBin 2.0.
    Wu YW; Singer SW
    Curr Protoc; 2021 May; 1(5):e128. PubMed ID: 33961733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0.
    Asnicar F; Thomas AM; Beghini F; Mengoni C; Manara S; Manghi P; Zhu Q; Bolzan M; Cumbo F; May U; Sanders JG; Zolfo M; Kopylova E; Pasolli E; Knight R; Mirarab S; Huttenhower C; Segata N
    Nat Commun; 2020 May; 11(1):2500. PubMed ID: 32427907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subtractive assembly for comparative metagenomics, and its application to type 2 diabetes metagenomes.
    Wang M; Doak TG; Ye Y
    Genome Biol; 2015 Nov; 16():243. PubMed ID: 26527161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HuMiChip2 for strain level identification and functional profiling of human microbiomes.
    Tu Q; Li J; Shi Z; Chen Y; Lin L; Li J; Wang H; Yan J; Zhou Q; Li X; Li L; Zhou J; He Z
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Jan; 101(1):423-435. PubMed ID: 27734124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autometa: automated extraction of microbial genomes from individual shotgun metagenomes.
    Miller IJ; Rees ER; Ross J; Miller I; Baxa J; Lopera J; Kerby RL; Rey FE; Kwan JC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e57. PubMed ID: 30838416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets.
    Sangwan N; Xia F; Gilbert JA
    Microbiome; 2016 Mar; 4():8. PubMed ID: 26951112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
    Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes.
    Parks DH; Imelfort M; Skennerton CT; Hugenholtz P; Tyson GW
    Genome Res; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1043-55. PubMed ID: 25977477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets.
    Wu YW; Simmons BA; Singer SW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):605-7. PubMed ID: 26515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovering microbial genomes from metagenomes in hypersaline environments: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
    Ramos-Barbero MD; Martin-Cuadrado AB; Viver T; Santos F; Martinez-Garcia M; Antón J
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 42(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 30528276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate Annotation of Microbial Metagenomic Genes and Identification of Core Sets.
    Vanni C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2242():115-138. PubMed ID: 33961221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strain/species-specific probe design for microbial identification microarrays.
    Tu Q; He Z; Deng Y; Zhou J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 Aug; 79(16):5085-8. PubMed ID: 23747703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. VirFinder: a novel k-mer based tool for identifying viral sequences from assembled metagenomic data.
    Ren J; Ahlgren NA; Lu YY; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
    Microbiome; 2017 Jul; 5(1):69. PubMed ID: 28683828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced metagenome sequencing for strain-resolution taxonomic profiles.
    Snipen L; Angell IL; Rognes T; Rudi K
    Microbiome; 2021 Mar; 9(1):79. PubMed ID: 33781324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery of 197 eukaryotic bins reveals major challenges for eukaryote genome reconstruction from terrestrial metagenomes.
    Saraiva JP; Bartholomäus A; Toscan RB; Baldrian P; Nunes da Rocha U
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Jul; 23(5):1066-1076. PubMed ID: 36847735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.