BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24523362)

  • 1. Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.
    Nasseri M; Gahramanov S; Netto JP; Fu R; Muldoon LL; Varallyay C; Hamilton BE; Neuwelt EA
    Neuro Oncol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 24523362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs. gadoteridol: a pilot study.
    Gahramanov S; Raslan AM; Muldoon LL; Hamilton BE; Rooney WD; Varallyay CG; Njus JM; Haluska M; Neuwelt EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb; 79(2):514-23. PubMed ID: 20395065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudoprogression of glioblastoma after chemo- and radiation therapy: diagnosis by using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with ferumoxytol versus gadoteridol and correlation with survival.
    Gahramanov S; Muldoon LL; Varallyay CG; Li X; Kraemer DF; Fu R; Hamilton BE; Rooney WD; Neuwelt EA
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):842-52. PubMed ID: 23204544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma.
    Tensaouti F; Khalifa J; Lusque A; Plas B; Lotterie JA; Berry I; Laprie A; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Lubrano V
    Neuroradiology; 2017 Oct; 59(10):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 28842741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol and gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI define glioblastoma pseudoprogression.
    Barajas RF; Hamilton BE; Schwartz D; McConnell HL; Pettersson DR; Horvath A; Szidonya L; Varallyay CG; Firkins J; Jaboin JJ; Kubicky CD; Raslan AM; Dogan A; Cetas JS; Ciporen J; Han SJ; Ambady P; Muldoon LL; Woltjer R; Rooney WD; Neuwelt EA
    Neuro Oncol; 2019 Mar; 21(4):517-526. PubMed ID: 30277536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
    Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refinement of response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) using non-enhancing lesion type and contrast enhancement evolution pattern in IDH wild-type glioblastomas.
    Moon HH; Kim HS; Park JE; Kim YH; Kim JH
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):654. PubMed ID: 34074252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
    Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM.
    Rowe LS; Butman JA; Mackey M; Shih JH; Cooley-Zgela T; Ning H; Gilbert MR; Smart DK; Camphausen K; Krauze AV
    J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 29767308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The predictive value of absolute lymphocyte counts on tumor progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Xi J; Hassan B; Katumba RGN; Khaddour K; Govindan A; Luo J; Huang J; Campian JL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):285. PubMed ID: 33726710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of pseudoprogression using MRI perfusion in patients with glioblastoma multiforme may predict improved survival.
    Gahramanov S; Varallyay C; Tyson RM; Lacy C; Fu R; Netto JP; Nasseri M; White T; Woltjer RL; Gultekin SH; Neuwelt EA
    CNS Oncol; 2014 Nov; 3(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 25438810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET.
    Kebir S; Fimmers R; Galldiks N; Schäfer N; Mack F; Schaub C; Stuplich M; Niessen M; Tzaridis T; Simon M; Stoffels G; Langen KJ; Scheffler B; Glas M; Herrlinger U
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 May; 22(9):2190-6. PubMed ID: 26673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined analysis of MGMT methylation and dynamic-susceptibility-contrast MRI for the distinction between early and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma patients.
    Bani-Sadr A; Berner LP; Barritault M; Chamard L; Bidet CM; Eker OF; Hermier M; Guyotat J; Jouanneau E; Meyronet D; Gouttard S; D'Hombres A; Iziquierdo C; Honnorat J; Berthezène Y; Ducray F
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2019 Oct; 175(9):534-543. PubMed ID: 31208813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual inspection of MR relative cerebral blood volume maps has limited value for distinguishing progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma multiforme patients.
    Kerkhof M; Tans PL; Hagenbeek RE; Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ; Holla FK; Postma TJ; Straathof CS; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJ; Vos MJ
    CNS Oncol; 2017 Oct; 6(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 28984142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide: comparison study of standard and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chu HH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yoon TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 23771912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression in Patients with Glioblastomas Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI.
    Wang S; Martinez-Lage M; Sakai Y; Chawla S; Kim SG; Alonso-Basanta M; Lustig RA; Brem S; Mohan S; Wolf RL; Desai A; Poptani H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 26450533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric response map as an imaging biomarker to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma.
    Tsien C; Galbán CJ; Chenevert TL; Johnson TD; Hamstra DA; Sundgren PC; Junck L; Meyer CR; Rehemtulla A; Lawrence T; Ross BD
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(13):2293-9. PubMed ID: 20368564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI perfusion in determining pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Young RJ; Gupta A; Shah AD; Graber JJ; Chan TA; Zhang Z; Shi W; Beal K; Omuro AM
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 23151413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognosis prediction of measurable enhancing lesion after completion of standard concomitant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma patients: application of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Kim JH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113587. PubMed ID: 25419975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the hypervascularized fraction of glioblastomas using a volume analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI may help to identify pseudoprogression.
    Roques M; Catalaa I; Raveneau M; Attal J; Siegfried A; Darcourt J; Cognard C; de Champfleur NM; Bonneville F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0270216. PubMed ID: 36227862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.