These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24524414)
1. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss. Hill-Feltham P; Roberts SA; Gladdis R J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Feb; 128(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 24524414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two bone anchored hearing instruments: BP100 and Ponto Pro. Olsen SØ; Glad H; Nielsen LH Int J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 50(12):920-8. PubMed ID: 21916792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results. Hougaard DD; Boldsen SK; Jensen AM; Hansen S; Thomassen PC Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 274(8):3011-3019. PubMed ID: 28534117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful? Kompis M; Kurz A; Pfiffner F; Senn P; Arnold A; Caversaccio M Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S47-50. PubMed ID: 24869443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients? McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Makki FM; Bance M J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact. de Wolf MJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 19638942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the evaluation of a superpower sound processor for bone-anchored hearing. Bosman AJ; Kruyt IJ; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS; Snik AFM Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 43(2):450-455. PubMed ID: 28950053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method. Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss? Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 15724087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users. Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications for bone-anchored hearing AIDS: a functional outcomes study. Dumper J; Hodgetts B; Liu R; Brandner N J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19344618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results. Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit of a new hearing device utilizing cartilage conduction. Nishimura T; Hosoi H; Saito O; Miyamae R; Shimokura R; Matsui T; Iwakura T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Oct; 40(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 23395550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino. Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]