These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24525262)

  • 1. The dynamics of attentional sampling during visual search revealed by Fourier analysis of periodic noise interference.
    Dugué L; Vanrullen R
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24525262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Oscillatory Phase in Determining the Temporal Organization of Perception: Evidence from Sensory Entrainment.
    Ronconi L; Melcher D
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(44):10636-10644. PubMed ID: 28972130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural rhythms of periodic temporal attention.
    Zalta A; Petkoski S; Morillon B
    Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1051. PubMed ID: 32103014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):715-728. PubMed ID: 31974939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.
    Walsh KP; Pasanen EG; McFadden D
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():160-7. PubMed ID: 24732070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention Periodically Binds Visual Features As Single Events Depending on Neural Oscillations Phase-Locked to Action.
    Nakayama R; Motoyoshi I
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(21):4153-4161. PubMed ID: 30886011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive development attenuates audiovisual distraction and promotes the selection of task-relevant perceptual saliency during visual search on complex scenes.
    Cavallina C; Puccio G; Capurso M; Bremner AJ; Santangelo V
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():91-98. PubMed ID: 30007880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amplitude-modulated auditory stimuli influence selection of visual spatial frequencies.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23589802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct perceptual rhythms for feature and conjunction searches.
    Dugué L; Xue AM; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):22. PubMed ID: 28362897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal attentional entrainment: Insights from magicians.
    Barnhart AS; Ehlert MJ; Goldinger SD; Mackey AD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 29520711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sustained Visual Priming Effects Can Emerge from Attentional Oscillation and Temporal Expectation.
    Wang M; Huang Y; Luo H; Zhang H
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(18):3657-3674. PubMed ID: 32253359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search.
    Merholz G; Grabot L; VanRullen R; Dugué L
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6688. PubMed ID: 35461325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.