These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24525338)

  • 41. Gay male attraction toward muscular men: does mating context matter?
    Varangis E; Lanzieri N; Hildebrandt T; Feldman M
    Body Image; 2012 Mar; 9(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 22342537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.
    Little AC; Burt DM; Penton-Voak IS; Perrett DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1462):39-44. PubMed ID: 12123296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology.
    Clarkson TR; Sidari MJ; Sains R; Alexander M; Harrison M; Mefodeva V; Pearson S; Lee AJ; Dixson BJW
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191209. PubMed ID: 32218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mate retention Strategies, Self-Esteem, Mate Value and Facial Attractiveness Disparity in Brazil and in the UK.
    Nascimento BS; Little AC
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2019; 45(6):461-472. PubMed ID: 30645184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relations of exercise to body image and sexual desirability among a sample of university students.
    Holmes T; Chamberlin P; Young M
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Jun; 74(3 Pt 1):920-2. PubMed ID: 8058880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of group status on physical attractiveness preferences--from the Japanese case to a general cognitive perspective.
    Kowner R
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1996 May; 122(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 8674998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.
    Price ME; Pound N; Dunn J; Hopkins S; Kang J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52532. PubMed ID: 23300976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Weight stigma in existing romantic relationships.
    Boyes AD; Latner JD
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2009; 35(4):282-93. PubMed ID: 19466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Psychometric Evaluation and Cultural Correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF) in Iran.
    Atari M; Barbaro N; Shackelford TK; Chegeni R
    Evol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):1474704917695267. PubMed ID: 28248556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do women's preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?
    Jünger J; Motta-Mena NV; Cardenas R; Bailey D; Rosenfield KA; Schild C; Penke L; Puts DA
    Horm Behav; 2018 Nov; 106():122-134. PubMed ID: 30342884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students.
    Weeden J; Sabini J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Feb; 36(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 17136591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of relationship status, mate seeking, and sex on intrasexual competition.
    Fisher ML; Tran US; Voracek M
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):493-508. PubMed ID: 18807423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do orgasms give women feedback about mate choice?
    Gallup GG; Ampel BC; Wedberg N; Pogosjan A
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Nov; 12(5):958-78. PubMed ID: 25376054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ovulatory shifts in women's attractions to primary partners and other men: further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness.
    Larson CM; Pillsworth EG; Haselton MG
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44456. PubMed ID: 22984512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).
    Penton-Voak IS; Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Tiddeman BP; Perrett DI
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 14498802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs.
    Pavlovič O; Fiala V; Kleisner K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):550. PubMed ID: 33436663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Good mates retain us right: investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction.
    Salkicevic S; Stanic AL; Grabovac MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 12(5):1038-52. PubMed ID: 25481238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.