These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24525488)

  • 1. Evaluating treatment effectiveness under model misspecification: A comparison of targeted maximum likelihood estimation with bias-corrected matching.
    Kreif N; Gruber S; Radice R; Grieve R; Sekhon JS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2315-2336. PubMed ID: 24525488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Schomaker M; Rachet B; Schnitzer ME
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2530-2546. PubMed ID: 29687470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collaborative targeted maximum likelihood for time to event data.
    Stitelman OM; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 21. PubMed ID: 21969976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bagged one-to-one matching for efficient and robust treatment effect estimation.
    Samuels LR; Greevy RA
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4353-4373. PubMed ID: 30101483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
    Pirracchio R; Petersen ML; van der Laan M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25515168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    Dashti SG; Lee KJ; Simpson JA; White IR; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Jul; 193(7):1019-1030. PubMed ID: 38400653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Apr; 5(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 20949126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing matching and analysis combinations for estimating causal effects.
    Colson KE; Rudolph KE; Zimmerman SC; Goin DE; Stuart EA; Laan Mv; Ahern J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23222. PubMed ID: 26980444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-Adaptive Estimation for Double-Robust Methods in Population-Based Cancer Epidemiology: Risk Differences for Lung Cancer Mortality by Emergency Presentation.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Belot A; Valeri L; Cerulli G; Maringe C; Rachet B
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 187(4):871-878. PubMed ID: 29020131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for marginal time-dependent treatment effects under density misspecification.
    Schnitzer ME; Moodie EE; Platt RW
    Biostatistics; 2013 Jan; 14(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22797173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 26. PubMed ID: 21731529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved multiply robust estimator for the average treatment effect.
    Wang C; Wei K; Huang C; Yu Y; Qin G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):231. PubMed ID: 37821829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Balance Super Learner: A robust adaptation of the Super Learner to improve estimation of the average treatment effect in the treated based on propensity score matching.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2504-2518. PubMed ID: 28339317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments in observational studies with a binary outcome.
    Hu L; Gu C; Lopez M; Ji J; Wisnivesky J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3218-3234. PubMed ID: 32450775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.