These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24526224)

  • 1. The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis.
    Mignan A
    Sci Rep; 2014 Feb; 4():4099. PubMed ID: 24526224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
    Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-Term Foreshocks as Key Information for Mainshock Timing and Rupture: The M
    Papadopoulos GA; Agalos A; Minadakis G; Triantafyllou I; Krassakis P
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33028009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nucleation and Cascade Features of Earthquake Mainshock Statistically Explored from Foreshock Seismicity.
    Kamogawa M; Nanjo KZ; Izutsu J; Orihara Y; Nagao T; Uyeda S
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Apr; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33267135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of foreshocks and aftershocks of the nonconservative self-organized critical Olami-Feder-Christensen model.
    Helmstetter A; Hergarten S; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046120. PubMed ID: 15600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip During the Initiation Phase of the 2017
    Caballero E; Chounet A; Duputel Z; Jara J; Twardzik C; Jolivet R
    Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Mar; 48(6):e2020GL091916. PubMed ID: 33867597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California.
    Moutote L; Marsan D; Lengliné O; Duputel Z
    Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Apr; 48(7):e2020GL091757. PubMed ID: 34219839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.
    Dieterich JH; Kilgore B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3787-94. PubMed ID: 11607666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study.
    Lippiello E; Godano C; de Arcangelis L
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Feb; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33266889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-Magnitude Statistics of Laboratory Foreshocks Vary With Shear Velocity, Fault Slip Rate, and Shear Stress.
    Bolton DC; Shreedharan S; Rivière J; Marone C
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2021 Nov; 126(11):e2021JB022175. PubMed ID: 35865108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.
    Kato A; Obara K; Igarashi T; Tsuruoka H; Nakagawa S; Hirata N
    Science; 2012 Feb; 335(6069):705-8. PubMed ID: 22267578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distribution of the largest aftershocks in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of the universal Båth law.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 May; 71(5 Pt 2):056127. PubMed ID: 16089622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks.
    Gulia L; Wiemer S
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7777):193-199. PubMed ID: 31597971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake.
    Schurr B; Asch G; Hainzl S; Bedford J; Hoechner A; Palo M; Wang R; Moreno M; Bartsch M; Zhang Y; Oncken O; Tilmann F; Dahm T; Victor P; Barrientos S; Vilotte JP
    Nature; 2014 Aug; 512(7514):299-302. PubMed ID: 25119049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool to forecast large earthquakes.
    Lippiello E; Marzocchi W; de Arcangelis L; Godano C
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():846. PubMed ID: 23152938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A laboratory perspective on accelerating preparatory processes before earthquakes and implications for foreshock detectability.
    Goebel THW; Schuster V; Kwiatek G; Pandey K; Dresen G
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jul; 15(1):5588. PubMed ID: 38961092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decay of aftershock density with distance does not indicate triggering by dynamic stress.
    Richards-Dinger K; Stein RS; Toda S
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):583-6. PubMed ID: 20882015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intense foreshocks and a slow slip event preceded the 2014 Iquique Mw 8.1 earthquake.
    Ruiz S; Metois M; Fuenzalida A; Ruiz J; Leyton F; Grandin R; Vigny C; Madariaga R; Campos J
    Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6201):1165-9. PubMed ID: 25061132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microearthquakes preceding a M4.2 Earthquake Offshore Istanbul.
    Malin PE; Bohnhoff M; Blümle F; Dresen G; Martínez-Garzón P; Nurlu M; Ceken U; Kadirioglu FT; Kartal RF; Kilic T; Yanik K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16176. PubMed ID: 30385791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.