These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24526500)
21. Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations intervention: a meta-analysis of five clinical trials. Qian J; Chen Z; Ma J; Ge J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 22045690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Two zotarolimus-eluting stent generations: a meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials versus other limus-eluting stents and an adjusted indirect comparison. Cassese S; Ndrepepa G; King LA; Tada T; Fusaro M; Kastrati A Heart; 2012 Nov; 98(22):1632-40. PubMed ID: 22949487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cassese S; Fusaro M; Byrne RA; Tada T; Hoppmann P; Joner M; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A Int J Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 175(3):484-91. PubMed ID: 25012497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial. Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL; Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SPIRIT IV trial design: a large-scale randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Nikolsky E; Lansky AJ; Sudhir K; Doostzadeh J; Cutlip DE; Piana R; Su X; White R; Simonton CA; Stone GW Am Heart J; 2009 Oct; 158(4):520-526.e2. PubMed ID: 19781409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: final 3-year results of the Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions trial. Brener SJ; Kereiakes DJ; Simonton CA; Rizvi A; Newman W; Mastali K; Wang JC; Caputo R; Smith RS; Ying SW; Cutlip DE; Stone GW Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1035-42. PubMed ID: 24268218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in a diabetic population. Laynez A; Sardi G; Hauville C; Barbash IM; Pakala R; Torguson R; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 81(5):759-65. PubMed ID: 22488756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Twelve-month clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent as compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Cassese S; Piccolo R; Galasso G; De Rosa R; Piscione F Int J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 150(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 21315461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The "final" 5-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. Kirtane AJ; Leon MB; Ball MW; Bajwa HS; Sketch MH; Coleman PS; Stoler RC; Papadakos S; Cutlip DE; Mauri L; Kandzari DE; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 6(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 23523453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus eluting stents following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of published studies. Deng S; Yi X; Tian Z Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(52):e23810. PubMed ID: 33350767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of everolimus versus other rapamycin derivative-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu LL; Bourantas CV; Iqbal J; Dong SJ; Campos CM; Li MH; Ye F; Tian NL; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW; Chen SL J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 64(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 24560821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term risk of late and very late stent thrombosis in patients treated with everolimus against paclitaxel-eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis. Li P; Liu JP Coron Artery Dis; 2014 Aug; 25(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 24818639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Schömig A; Dibra A; Windecker S; Mehilli J; Suárez de Lezo J; Kaiser C; Park SJ; Goy JJ; Lee JH; Di Lorenzo E; Wu J; Jüni P; Pfisterer ME; Meier B; Kastrati A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 50(14):1373-80. PubMed ID: 17903638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bare metal stent restenosis. Almalla M; Schröder JW; Pross V; Stegemann E; Marx N; Hoffmann R Am J Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 108(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 21624553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-year clinical outcomes of the NOBORI biolimus-eluting stents versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stents in small vessel disease. Jinnouchi H; Kuramitsu S; Shinozaki T; Hiromasa T; Kobayashi Y; Morinaga T; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(5):E132-E138. PubMed ID: 26708085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective, randomized comparison of promus everolimus-eluting and TAXUS Liberte paclitaxel-eluting stent systems in patients with coronary artery disease eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROMISE study. Kim U; Lee CH; Jo JH; Lee HW; Choi YJ; Son JW; Lee SH; Park JS; Shin DG; Kim YJ; Jeong MH; Cho MC; Bae JH; Lee JH; Kang TS; Jung KT; Jung KH; Lee SW; Cho JH; Kim W; Hur SH; Kim KS; Park HS; Kim MH; Hwang JY; Kim DI; Kim TI J Korean Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(11):1609-14. PubMed ID: 24265523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Leon MB; Nikolsky E; Cutlip DE; Mauri L; Liberman H; Wilson H; Patterson J; Moses J; Kandzari DE; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20965463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 76 studies. Zhang X; Xie J; Li G; Chen Q; Xu B PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97934. PubMed ID: 24844284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical efficacy of drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Mahmud E; Bromberg-Marin G; Palakodeti V; Ang L; Creanga D; Demaria AN J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 51(25):2385-95. PubMed ID: 18565394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-Term Safety of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents: Evidence From a Comprehensive Network Meta-Analysis. Palmerini T; Benedetto U; Biondi-Zoccai G; Della Riva D; Bacchi-Reggiani L; Smits PC; Vlachojannis GJ; Jensen LO; Christiansen EH; Berencsi K; Valgimigli M; Orlandi C; Petrou M; Rapezzi C; Stone GW J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 65(23):2496-507. PubMed ID: 26065988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]