These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24528010)

  • 21. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
    El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening of drug target proteins by 2D ligand matching approach.
    Feng J; Guo H; Wang J; Lu T
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Feb; 83(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 24034065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of reverse docking for target prediction of marine compounds with anti-tumor activity.
    Chen F; Wang Z; Wang C; Xu Q; Liang J; Xu X; Yang J; Wang C; Jiang T; Yu R
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Oct; 77():372-377. PubMed ID: 28950183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role and application of in silico docking in chemical genomics research.
    Jongejan A; de Graaf C; Vermeulen NP; Leurs R; de Esch IJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2005; 310():63-91. PubMed ID: 16350947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2.
    Alhossary A; Handoko SD; Mu Y; Kwoh CK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2214-6. PubMed ID: 25717194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. idTarget: a web server for identifying protein targets of small chemical molecules with robust scoring functions and a divide-and-conquer docking approach.
    Wang JC; Chu PY; Chen CM; Lin JH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jul; 40(Web Server issue):W393-9. PubMed ID: 22649057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. QuickVina: accelerating AutoDock Vina using gradient-based heuristics for global optimization.
    Handoko SD; Ouyang X; Su CT; Kwoh CK; Ong YS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1266-72. PubMed ID: 22641710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility.
    Wagner JR; Sørensen J; Hensley N; Wong C; Zhu C; Perison T; Amaro RE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Sep; 13(9):4584-4592. PubMed ID: 28800393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach.
    Li H; Gao Z; Kang L; Zhang H; Yang K; Yu K; Luo X; Zhu W; Chen K; Shen J; Wang X; Jiang H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul; 34(Web Server issue):W219-24. PubMed ID: 16844997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Docking studies on DNA intercalators.
    Gilad Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ProPose: a docking engine based on a fully configurable protein-ligand interaction model.
    Seifert MH; Schmitt F; Herz T; Kramer B
    J Mol Model; 2004 Dec; 10(5-6):342-57. PubMed ID: 15597203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Differential Evolution Approach to Protein⁻Ligand Docking.
    Lin H; Siu SWI
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30326669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational approaches: discovery of GTPase HRas as prospective drug target for 1,3-diazine scaffolds.
    Kumar S; Sharma D; Narasimhan B; Ramasamy K; Shah SAA; Lim SM; Mani V
    BMC Chem; 2019 Dec; 13(1):96. PubMed ID: 31355369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What is the potential of structure-based target prediction methods?
    Schomburg KT; Rarey M
    Future Med Chem; 2014; 6(18):1987-9. PubMed ID: 25531963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.