These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24528244)

  • 1. Application of the Brixton spatial anticipation test in stroke: ecological validity and performance characteristics.
    Vordenberg JA; Barrett JJ; Doninger NA; Contardo CP; Ozoude KA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(2):300-16. PubMed ID: 24528244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical utility of the AlphaFIM® instrument in stroke rehabilitation.
    Lo A; Tahair N; Sharp S; Bayley MT
    Int J Stroke; 2012 Feb; 7(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 22103839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
    Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
    Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Racial/ethnic differences in FIM scores and length of stay for underinsured patients undergoing stroke inpatient rehabilitation.
    Chiou-Tan FY; Keng MJ; Graves DE; Chan KT; Rintala DH
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 May; 85(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 16628148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional outcome after stroke in patients with aphasia and neglect: assessment by the motor and cognitive functional independence measure instrument.
    Gialanella B; Ferlucci C
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010; 30(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 20720414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16.
    Ward I; Pivko S; Brooks G; Parkin K
    PM R; 2011 Nov; 3(11):1013-21. PubMed ID: 22108228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical characteristics and functional outcomes of ischemic stroke in different vascular territories.
    Ng YS; Stein J; Ning M; Black-Schaffer RM
    Stroke; 2007 Aug; 38(8):2309-14. PubMed ID: 17615368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test sensitive to frontal dysfunction? Evidence from patients with frontal and posterior lesions.
    Mole J; Foddai E; Chan E; Xu T; Cipolotti L
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Aug; 42(6):531-543. PubMed ID: 32619157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke.
    Shelton FD; Volpe BT; Reding M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2001; 15(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11944745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes with stroke and lateropulsion: a case-matched controlled study.
    Babyar SR; White H; Shafi N; Reding M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 18334602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal functional changes, depression, and health-related quality of life among stroke survivors living at home after inpatient rehabilitation.
    Mutai H; Furukawa T; Nakanishi K; Hanihara T
    Psychogeriatrics; 2016 May; 16(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 26179118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of stroke rehabilitation outcome with xenon-enhanced computed tomography cerebral blood flow study.
    Araki Y; Furuichi M; Nokura H; Iwata T; Iwama T
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010; 19(6):450-7. PubMed ID: 20542710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test as a test for executive function: validity in patient groups and norms for older adults.
    van den Berg E; Nys GM; Brands AM; Ruis C; van Zandvoort MJ; Kessels RP
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):695-703. PubMed ID: 19638251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of subtypes of neglect on functional outcome in stroke patients.
    Spaccavento S; Cellamare F; Falcone R; Loverre A; Nardulli R
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Nov; 60(6):376-381. PubMed ID: 28958616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GABAergic drug use and global, cognitive, and motor functional outcomes after stroke.
    Schwitzguébel AJ; Benaïm C; Carda S; Torea Filgueira AM; Frischknecht R; Rapin PA
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 59(5-6):320-325. PubMed ID: 27132886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional gain following rehabilitation of recurrent ischemic stroke in the elderly: experience of a post-acute care rehabilitation setting.
    Mizrahi EH; Fleissig Y; Arad M; Adunsky A
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2015; 60(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 25239513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-validation of a model for predicting functional status and length of stay in patients with stroke.
    Sebastia E; Duarte E; Boza R; Samitier B; Tejero M; Marco E; Muniesa JM; Belmonte R; Escalada F
    J Rehabil Med; 2006 May; 38(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 16702089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of the prediction method based on a logarithmic model for functional recovery in stroke patients: in case of using the motor-Functional Independence Measure score.
    Kimura Y; Yamada M; Hamanaka K; Tanaka N; Muroh Y
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2017 Jun; 40(2):134-137. PubMed ID: 28177943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new measure to assess trunk impairment after stroke (trunk impairment scale): its psychometric properties.
    Fujiwara T; Liu M; Tsuji T; Sonoda S; Mizuno K; Akaboshi K; Hase K; Masakado Y; Chino N
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 83(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 15314532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor and cognitive function analysis for home discharge using the Functional Independence Measure in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation at a long-term acute-care hospital.
    Sasanuma N; Takahashi K; Itani Y; Tanaka T; Yamauchi S; Mabuchi S; Kodama N; Ishihara M; Masuyama T; Miyamoto Y; Domen K
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Dec; 51(6):781-92. PubMed ID: 26042556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.