These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24528460)

  • 1. The impact of cueing on written examinations of clinical decision making: a case study.
    Desjardins I; Touchie C; Pugh D; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 48(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 24528460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Authenticity of instruction and student performance: a prospective randomised trial.
    La Rochelle JS; Durning SJ; Pangaro LN; Artino AR; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth L
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):807-17. PubMed ID: 21752077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
    Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A closer look at cueing effects in multiple-choice questions.
    Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP; Donkers HH
    Med Educ; 1996 Jan; 30(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 8736188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?
    Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):974-9. PubMed ID: 15327679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Very-short-answer questions: reliability, discrimination and acceptability.
    Sam AH; Field SM; Collares CF; van der Vleuten CPM; Wass VJ; Melville C; Harris J; Meeran K
    Med Educ; 2018 Apr; 52(4):447-455. PubMed ID: 29388317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of multiple-choice tests and free-response tests in examinations of clinical competence.
    Newble DI; Baxter A; Elmslie RG
    Med Educ; 1979 Jul; 13(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts.
    Coderre SP; Harasym P; Mandin H; Fick G
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 4():23. PubMed ID: 15530166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-menu questions in computer-based assessments: a retrospective observational study.
    Cerutti B; Blondon K; Galetto A
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26861755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of a musculoskeletal physical examination decision-making test for medical students.
    Bishop JY; Awan HM; Rowley DM; Nagel RW
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 23725932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A solution to the cueing effects of multiple choice questions: the Un-Q format.
    Veloski JJ; Rabinowitz HK; Robeson MR
    Med Educ; 1993 Jul; 27(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 8412880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.
    Schoonheim-Klein ME; Habets LL; Aartman IH; van der Vleuten CP; Hoogstraten J; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Nov; 10(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 17038015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
    Vorstenbosch MA; Klaassen TP; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22674609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do students with dyslexia perform in extended matching questions, short answer questions and observed structured clinical examinations?
    Gibson S; Leinster S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Aug; 16(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 21249518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Student-written single-best answer questions predict performance in finals.
    Walsh J; Harris B; Tayyaba S; Harris D; Smith P
    Clin Teach; 2016 Oct; 13(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 26450346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.
    Nasir AA; Yusuf AS; Abdur-Rahman LO; Babalola OM; Adeyeye AA; Popoola AA; Adeniran JO
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 25012605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.