These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24528587)

  • 21. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Algorithms of likelihood ratio for discriminating full sibling from half sibling].
    Zhao SM; Zhang LN; Zhang SH; Zhang N; Zhao ZM; Li CT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 22619804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The comparison of DNA mixture profiles with multiple persons of interest.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102592. PubMed ID: 34739935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Paternity testing and other inference about relationships from DNA mixtures.
    Green PJ; Mortera J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():128-137. PubMed ID: 28314238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():102-10. PubMed ID: 24528588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
    Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Likelihood ratios for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing in criminal cases.
    Jarjoura D; Jamison J; Androulakakis S
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 8113714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exact likelihood ratio calculations for pairwise cases.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():218-224. PubMed ID: 28482259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inference of admixed ancestry with Ancestry Informative Markers.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():147-153. PubMed ID: 31323537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.