BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24528588)

  • 1. Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():102-10. PubMed ID: 24528588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of SmartRank: A likelihood ratio software for searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles.
    Benschop CCG; van de Merwe L; de Jong J; Vanvooren V; Kempenaers M; Kees van der Beek CP; Barni F; Reyes EL; Moulin L; Pene L; Haned H; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():145-153. PubMed ID: 28441635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The successful use of familial searching in six Hungarian high profile cases by applying a new module in Familias 3.
    Kling D; Füredi S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():24-32. PubMed ID: 27267559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The first successful use of a low stringency familial match in a French criminal investigation.
    Pham-Hoai E; Crispino F; Hampikian G
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):816-9. PubMed ID: 24502416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does an English appeal court ruling increase the risks of miscarriages of justice when complex DNA profiles are searched against the national DNA database?
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():167-75. PubMed ID: 25151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evidentiary values of "cold hits" in a DNA database search on two-person mixture.
    Chung YK; Fung WK
    Sci Justice; 2011 Mar; 51(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21334575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
    Tvedebrink T; Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():98-104. PubMed ID: 25576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying common donors in DNA mixtures, with applications to database searches.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():40-47. PubMed ID: 27780107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Database extraction strategies for low-template evidence.
    Bleka Ø; Dørum G; Haned H; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():134-41. PubMed ID: 24528591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
    Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches.
    Ryan K; Williams DG; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():227-239. PubMed ID: 27768939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
    Taylor D; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.