These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24529588)

  • 1. Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis.
    Chapman RA; Somani BK; Robertson A; Healy S; Kata SG
    Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1003-5. PubMed ID: 24529588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
    Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
    Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.
    Collins JW; Keeley FX; Timoney A
    BJU Int; 2004 May; 93(7):1023-6. PubMed ID: 15142156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
    Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
    Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
    Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures.
    Somani BK; Robertson A; Kata SG
    Urology; 2011 Sep; 78(3):528-30. PubMed ID: 21459421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
    Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
    Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
    Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
    Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
    Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.
    Talso M; Goumas IK; Kamphuis GM; Dragos L; Tefik T; Traxer O; Somani BK
    Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. PubMed ID: 31656747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
    Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the costs of flexible ureteroscopy.
    Ziemba JB; Matlaga BR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2016 Dec; 68(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 27364080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
    Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.
    Van Compernolle D; Veys R; Elshout PJ; Beysens M; Van Haute C; De Groote L; Tailly T
    J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1454-1459. PubMed ID: 33775101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.