156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24529659)
21. Assessment of Aluminum Chloride Retraction Cords, Expasyl, and Tetrahydrozoline-Soaked Retraction Systems in Gingival Retraction.
Kavita K; Sinha RI; Singh R; Singh R; Reddy KRP; Kulkarni G
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S440-S443. PubMed ID: 33149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review.
Huang C; Somar M; Li K; Mohadeb JVN
J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 26378615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study.
Phatale S; Marawar PP; Byakod G; Lagdive SB; Kalburge JV
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 14(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 20922077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of seating velocity on pressure within impressions.
Hyde TP; Craddock H; Brunton P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 18992572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.
Chaudhari J; Prajapati P; Patel J; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG
Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26097353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement.
Sarmento HR; Leite FR; Dantas RV; Ogliari FA; Demarco FF; Faot F
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 24446590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation.
Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Effect of self-made colloid paste on gingival retraction in dogs].
Li N; Liu WC; Zhang Y; Han DW; Wang YJ; Hu WQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Apr; 19(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 20485985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The effect of filler content on properties of polyaddition-type silicone impression material].
Hosotani M; Katakura N; Kawakami M; Iijima K; Honma H
Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 2135525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A predictable gingival retraction system.
Pescatore C
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):7-12; quiz 18. PubMed ID: 11913273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Influence of autoclave sterilization on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of 5 additional silicone impression materials].
Xu TK; Sun ZH; Jiang Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 22800674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
