These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24529659)

  • 41. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A three-die cast technique for duplicating free gingival form in zirconia crowns: two case reports.
    Nozawa T; Tanaka K; Tsurumaki S; Ookame Y; Enomoto H; Ito K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Aug; 32(4):e135-41. PubMed ID: 22577656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of vinyl polysiloxane denture soft lining materials.
    Abe Y; Taji T; Hiasa K; Tsuga K; Akagawa Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Dec; 36(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 19840358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interactions of pigments and opacifiers on color stability of MDX4-4210/type A maxillofacial elastomers subjected to artificial aging.
    Kiat-Amnuay S; Mekayarajjananonth T; Powers JM; Chambers MS; Lemon JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 16543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report.
    Gupta A; Prithviraj DR; Gupta D; Shruti DP
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Mar; 13(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24431705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Dent Update; 2014 Jun; 41(5):432-4, 437-8. PubMed ID: 25073225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Isolating teeth with gingival retraction cord for bonding.
    Gupta R; Singla D; Verma R
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 May; 46(5):299-300. PubMed ID: 22785040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement systems: an in-vivo study.
    Aldhuwayhi S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8019-8025. PubMed ID: 37750631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Direct Cytotoxic Effects of Different Hemostatic Agents on Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
    Labban N; AlOtaibi H; Mokeem A; AlJameel M; AlRasheed T; Ali D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e896-e901. PubMed ID: 29322589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martins FV; Santana RB; Fonseca EM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 32008797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.
    Ünalan Değirmenci B; Karadağ Naldemir B; Değirmenci A
    Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Aug; 36(6):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 33566189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An
    Mehta S; Virani H; Memon S; Nirmal N
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):428-432. PubMed ID: 32308315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Expanded clinical uses of a novel tissue-retraction material.
    Shannon A
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):3-6; quiz 18. PubMed ID: 11913272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18589071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimation of cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid following the use of different gingival retraction systems in patients requiring fixed partial dentures - An original research.
    Mathew L; Mathew A; Saranya SK; Mohan AS
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 36092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.