These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24529659)

  • 61. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Biological Response Induced in Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts upon Exposure to Various Types of Injectable Astringent Retraction Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Kulbacka J; Wezgowiec J; Szewczyk A; Baczynska D; Zietek M; Wieckiewicz W; Saczko J
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33924145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. An innovative tissue-retraction material.
    Poss S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):13-7; quiz 18-9. PubMed ID: 11913271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials.
    Keyf F; Altunsoy S
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11210251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.
    Kazakova R; Vlahova A; Tomov G; Dimitrova M; Kazakov S; Zlatev S; Forte M; Barile G; Corsalini M; Capodiferro S
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 37628460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study.
    Lahoti KS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2016; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27041896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Drugs in dentistry. Agents for gingival retraction.
    Ciancio SG
    Dent Manage; 1986 Jul; 26(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 3525263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Performance of fast-setting impression materials in the reproduction of subgingival tooth surfaces without soft tissue retraction.
    Rudolph H; Röhl A; Walter MH; Luthardt RG; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 25010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners.
    Kulak-Ozkan Y; Sertgoz A; Gedik H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 12644808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Characteristics of domestically produced siloxane elastomer for making elastic gingival prosthetic device].
    Riakhovskiĭ AN; Poiurovskaia IIa; Kirillova EV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 16482030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Accurate transfer of soft tissue morphology with interim prosthesis to definitive cast.
    Noh K; Kwon KR; Kim HS; Kim DS; Pae A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 24286639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments.
    Paquette JM; Sheets CG
    Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
    Hondrum SO
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.