These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24529942)

  • 1. Early catastrophic failure of trochanteric fixation with the Dall-Miles Cable Grip System.
    Klinge SA; Vopat BG; Daniels AH; Bariteau JT; Rubin LE; Limbird R
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1289-91. PubMed ID: 24529942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery.
    Ting NT; Wera GD; Levine BR; Della Valle CJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6. PubMed ID: 20204557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The outcome of trochanteric reattachment in revision total hip arthroplasty with a Cable Grip System: mean 6-year follow-up.
    McCarthy JC; Bono JV; Turner RH; Kremchek T; Lee J
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Oct; 14(7):810-4. PubMed ID: 10537255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reattachment of the greater trochanter using the Dall-Miles cable grip system in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Koyama K; Higuchi F; Kubo M; Okawa T; Inoue A
    J Orthop Sci; 2001; 6(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trochanteric fixation by cable grip in hip replacement.
    Ritter MA; Eizember LE; Keating EM; Faris PM
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jul; 73(4):580-1. PubMed ID: 2071639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerclage wire fixation of trochanteric osteotomies in complex hip revision: our experience and comparison with cable-plate fixation.
    Collado A; Arvinius C; Serrano L; Otero J; Moro E; Marco F
    Hip Int; 2022 Sep; 32(5):672-676. PubMed ID: 33601917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reattachment of the greater trochanter in total hip arthroplasty: the pin-sleeve system compared with the Dall-Miles cable grip system.
    Takahira N; Itoman M; Uchiyama K; Takasaki S; Fukushima K
    Int Orthop; 2010 Aug; 34(6):793-7. PubMed ID: 20238113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cerclage Breakage in Trochanteric Revision - High Risk for Hip Endoprosthesis?
    Kraus MJ; Nowakowski AM
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(2):138-140. PubMed ID: 28809632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fixation systems of greater trochanteric osteotomies: biomechanical and clinical outcomes.
    Jarit GJ; Sathappan SS; Panchal A; Strauss E; Di Cesare PE
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2007 Oct; 15(10):614-24. PubMed ID: 17916785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables.
    Warren PJ; Thompson P; Fletcher MD
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Dec; 122(9-10):557-60. PubMed ID: 12483345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Dall-Miles cable and plate system for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Haddad FS; Marston RA; Muirhead-Allwood SK
    Injury; 1997 Sep; 28(7):445-7. PubMed ID: 9509084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved method for cable grip fixation of the greater trochanter after trochanteric slide osteotomy.
    Thakur NA; Crisco JJ; Moore DC; Froehlich JA; Limbird RS; Bliss JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 19062247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site.
    Huffman GR; Ries MD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Feb; 85(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 12571305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the outcome following the fixation of osteotomies or fractures associated with total hip replacement using cables or wires: the results at five years.
    Berton C; Puskas GJ; Christofilopoulos P; Stern R; Hoffmeyer P; Lübbeke A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11):1475-81. PubMed ID: 23109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer navigated hip resurfacing for patients with abnormal femoral anatomy.
    Olsen M; Schemitsch EH
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19583546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications of a cable grip system.
    Silverton CD; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Kull L; Conley A; Galante JO
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 8792246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gluteal muscle attachment during proximal femoral reconstruction in a canine model.
    Pluhar GE; Manley PA; Heiner JP; Vanderby R; Markel MD
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 17068814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femur fractures in patients with hip arthroplasty: indications for revision arthroplasty.
    Siegmeth A; Menth-Chiari WA; Wozasek GE; Vécsei V
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1998; 7(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 9876995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symptomatic trochanteric non-union following total hip replacement treated with reattachment combined with two-stage revision surgery of the femoral stem.
    Drampalos E; Bayam L; Oakley J; Hemmady M; Hodgkinson J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Jul; 101(6):e133-e135. PubMed ID: 31155900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.