These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24530266)

  • 1. First love does not die: a sustaining primacy effect on ERP components in an oddball paradigm.
    Kotchoubey B
    Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 1556():38-45. PubMed ID: 24530266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
    Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voluntary stimulus production enhances deviance processing in the brain.
    Nittono H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16257077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The whole is more than the sum of its parts - audiovisual processing of phonemes investigated with ERPs.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Stowe L; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23395711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of covert attention and stimulus complexity on the P3 response during an auditory continuous performance task.
    Shucard DW; Abara JP; McCabe DC; Benedict RB; Shucard JL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15331213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach.
    Grimm S; Schröger E; Bendixen A; Bäss P; Roye A; Deouell LY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):934-47. PubMed ID: 18289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16529831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2174-85. PubMed ID: 19947859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP and EOG responses elicited by deviant tones when presented with and without standard tones to reading subjects.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Nov; 42(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11812394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials reveal modelling of auditory repetition in the brain.
    Cooper RJ; Atkinson RJ; Clark RA; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23454030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.