These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24530609)
1. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults. Gygi B; Shafiro V Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():76-86. PubMed ID: 24530609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Xia J; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1888-98. PubMed ID: 25920841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What does successful speech-in-noise perception in aging depend on? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in older adults. Getzmann S; Wascher E; Falkenstein M Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():43-57. PubMed ID: 25681737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults. Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises. Desjardins JL; Doherty KA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention. Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cognitive resources related to speech recognition with a competing talker in young and older listeners. Meister H; Schreitmüller S; Grugel L; Ortmann M; Beutner D; Walger M; Meister IG Neuroscience; 2013 Mar; 232():74-82. PubMed ID: 23246616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences. Getzmann S; Wascher E Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise. Gosselin PA; Gagné JP Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker? Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task. Shafiro V; Gygi B J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 18247646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message. Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers. Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task. Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 16435697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]