These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24531985)

  • 1. Brain dynamics of distractibility: interaction between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of auditory attention.
    Bidet-Caulet A; Bottemanne L; Fonteneau C; Giard MH; Bertrand O
    Brain Topogr; 2015 May; 28(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 24531985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli.
    Latinus M; VanRullen R; Taylor MJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 11():36. PubMed ID: 20222946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atypical sensory reactivity influences auditory attentional control in adults with autism spectrum disorders.
    Karhson DS; Golob EJ
    Autism Res; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 26778164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction by salient stimuli in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for the role of task difficulty in bottom-up and top-down processing.
    Schneidt A; Jusyte A; Rauss K; Schönenberg M
    Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():206-220. PubMed ID: 29518704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
    Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced novelty-P3 associated with increased behavioral distractibility in schizophrenia.
    Cortiñas M; Corral MJ; Garrido G; Garolera M; Pajares M; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18450358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.
    Reiche M; Hartwigsen G; Widmann A; Saur D; Schröger E; Bendixen A
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():153-60. PubMed ID: 23123705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.
    Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling the Role of Cortico-Basal Ganglia Loops in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Visual Attention: An Investigation of Attention Deficits in Parkinson Disease.
    Tommasi G; Fiorio M; Yelnik J; Krack P; Sala F; Schmitt E; Fraix V; Bertolasi L; Le Bas JF; Ricciardi GK; Fiaschi A; Theeuwes J; Pollak P; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1215-37. PubMed ID: 25514652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146565. PubMed ID: 31765629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.
    Sarmiento BR; Matusz PJ; Sanabria D; Murray MM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):273-88. PubMed ID: 26466522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Push-pull competition between bottom-up and top-down auditory attention to natural soundscapes.
    Huang N; Elhilali M
    Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32196457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down controlled and bottom-up triggered orienting of auditory attention to pitch activate overlapping brain networks.
    Alho K; Salmi J; Koistinen S; Salonen O; Rinne T
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():136-45. PubMed ID: 25557401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain networks of bottom-up triggered and top-down controlled shifting of auditory attention.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Koistinen S; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():155-64. PubMed ID: 19577551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Bermudez P; Pantev C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1855-63. PubMed ID: 20521859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.