187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24532190)
1. Clinical value of DNA content assessment in endometrial cancer.
Mauland KK; Wik E; Salvesen HB
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2014 May; 86(3):154-63. PubMed ID: 24532190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical value of dna content assessment in endometrial cancer.
Mauland KK; Wik E; Salvesen HB
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2014 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 24482280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma.
Baak JP; Snijders W; van Diermen B; van Diest PJ; Diepenhorst FW; Benraadt J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4214-21. PubMed ID: 14615450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of DNA ploidy analysis in endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Jhala DN; Atkinson BF; Balsara GR; Hernandez E; Jhala NC
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2001 Oct; 5(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 11598854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Pfisterer J; Kommoss F; Sauerbrei W; Rendl I; Kiechle M; Kleine W; Pfleiderer A
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 7622098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in endometrial cancer stage I and II: a prospective 5-year survival study.
Friberg LG; Norén H; Delle U
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8175025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cell proliferation, measured as flow cytometric S-phase fraction, is a strong prognostic indicator in FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a population-based study.
Green RW; Engblom S; Baldetorp B; Hartman L; Måsbäck A; Bjurberg M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1064-73. PubMed ID: 26123703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of DNA Ploidy in the ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer.
Proctor L; Pradhan M; Leung S; Cheng A; Lee CH; Soslow RA; Gilks CB; Talhouk A; McAlpine JM; Danielsen HE; Hoang LN
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 146(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 28647100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year results of a prospective study on the prognostic role of ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: dNA aneuploidy identifies high-risk cases among the so-called 'low-risk' patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors.
Susini T; Amunni G; Molino C; Carriero C; Rapi S; Branconi F; Marchionni M; Taddei G; Scarselli G
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):882-90. PubMed ID: 17262824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: a reproducible and valid prognostic marker in a routine diagnostic setting.
Wik E; Trovik J; Iversen OE; Engelsen IB; Stefansson IM; Vestrheim LC; Haugland HK; Akslen LA; Salvesen HB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 201(6):603.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19800606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic significance of surgery, tumor size, malignancy grade, menopausal status, and DNA ploidy in endometrial stromal sarcoma.
Nordal RR; Kristensen GB; Kaern J; Stenwig AE; Pettersen EO; Tropé CG
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 8751558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in stage I endometrial cancer.
Song T; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Kim MK; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Bae DS; Kim BG
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jul; 122(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 21492921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of DNA ploidy in endometrial cancer.
Ikeda M; Watanabe Y; Nanjoh T; Noda K
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8349160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of prognostic factors following flow-cytometric DNA analysis after cytokeratin labelling: II. Cervical and endometrial cancer.
Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Hepp H; Kimmig R
Anal Cell Pathol; 2002; 24(4-5):147-58. PubMed ID: 12590151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA ploidy pattern in uterine cancer].
Watanabe T; Izumi S; Yamaoka K; Tsutsui F; Nozawa S
Nihon Rinsho; 1992 Oct; 50(10):2432-8. PubMed ID: 1447814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA flow cytometric analysis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinomas with lymph node metastases.
Coleman RL; Schink JC; Miller DS; Bauer KD; August CZ; Rademaker AW; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8349159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic indicator of overall survival in stage I endometrial endometrioid carcinoma.
Santala M; Talvensaari-Mattila A
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(6D):5191-6. PubMed ID: 14981988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA aneuploidy is associated with increased mortality for stage I endometrial cancer.
Terada K; Mattson D; Goo D; Shimizu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 15581950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferation in 309 colorectal carcinomas as determined by two-color multiparametric DNA flow cytometry.
Zarbo RJ; Nakhleh RE; Brown RD; Kubus JJ; Ma CK; Mackowiak P
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 79(11):2073-86. PubMed ID: 9179053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective analysis of DNA ploidy, proliferative index and epidermal growth factor receptor as prognostic factors for pretreated uterine cancer.
Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Kioka H; Katsube Y; Ohama K
Oncol Rep; 2000; 7(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 10767367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
