305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24532453)
1. Congenital anomalies identified at birth among infants born following assisted reproductive technology in Colorado.
Moses XJ; Torres T; Rasmussen A; George C
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 24532453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Congenital malformations associated with assisted reproductive technology: a California statewide analysis.
Kelley-Quon LI; Tseng CH; Janzen C; Shew SB
J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Jun; 48(6):1218-24. PubMed ID: 23845610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Congenital malformations in infants conceived following assisted reproductive technology in comparison with spontaneously conceived infants.
Farhi A; Reichman B; Boyko V; Mashiach S; Hourvitz A; Margalioth EJ; Levran D; Calderon I; Orvieto R; Ellenbogen A; Meyerovitch J; Ron-El R; Lerner-Geva L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Aug; 26(12):1171-9. PubMed ID: 23451839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prevalence of major congenital malformations during two periods of time, 1986-1994 and 1995-2002 in newborns conceived by assisted reproduction technology.
Merlob P; Sapir O; Sulkes J; Fisch B
Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 15953400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology and major birth defects in Western Australia.
Hansen M; Kurinczuk JJ; de Klerk N; Burton P; Bower C
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):852-63. PubMed ID: 22996103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similarly increased congenital anomaly rates after intrauterine insemination and IVF technologies: a retrospective cohort study.
Sagot P; Bechoua S; Ferdynus C; Facy A; Flamm X; Gouyon JB; Jimenez C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Mar; 27(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 22215631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization.
Hansen M; Kurinczuk JJ; Bower C; Webb S
N Engl J Med; 2002 Mar; 346(10):725-30. PubMed ID: 11882727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States.
Reefhuis J; Honein MA; Schieve LA; Correa A; Hobbs CA; Rasmussen SA;
Hum Reprod; 2009 Feb; 24(2):360-6. PubMed ID: 19010807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surveillance of congenital malformations in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology or other fertility treatments.
Heisey AS; Bell EM; Herdt-Losavio ML; Druschel C
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2015 Feb; 103(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 25684703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of birth defects among children 3 years after conception through assisted reproductive technology in China.
Yin L; Hang F; Gu LJ; Xu B; Ma D; Zhu GJ
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):744-9. PubMed ID: 23436719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Congenital anomalies after assisted reproductive technology.
Pinborg A; Henningsen AK; Malchau SS; Loft A
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 23290686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010.
Boulet SL; Kirby RS; Reefhuis J; Zhang Y; Sunderam S; Cohen B; Bernson D; Copeland G; Bailey MA; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM;
JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 170(6):e154934. PubMed ID: 27043648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do neonates conceived after assisted reproductive technology require neonatal surgery more frequently? A 5-year single-center experience.
Yanagisawa S; Maeda K; Tazuke Y; Tsuji Y; Kubota I; Koike Y; Yada Y; Kono Y; Takahashi N; Matsubara S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 May; 39(5):974-8. PubMed ID: 23510432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000.
Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Martin JA; Jeng G; Macaluso M
Pediatrics; 2003 May; 111(5 Pt 2):1159-62. PubMed ID: 12728130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction.
El-Chaar D; Yang Q; Gao J; Bottomley J; Leader A; Wen SW; Walker M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1557-61. PubMed ID: 18973885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
