305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24532453)
21. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of birth defects among livebirths.
Shechter-Maor G; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Abenhaim HA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 29450693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.
Schieve LA; Meikle SF; Ferre C; Peterson HB; Jeng G; Wilcox LS
N Engl J Med; 2002 Mar; 346(10):731-7. PubMed ID: 11882728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects.
Olson CK; Keppler-Noreuil KM; Romitti PA; Budelier WT; Ryan G; Sparks AE; Van Voorhis BJ
Fertil Steril; 2005 Nov; 84(5):1308-15. PubMed ID: 16275219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by assisted reproductive techniques.
Mozafari Kermani R; Nedaeifard L; Nateghi MR; Shahzadeh Fazeli A; Ahmadi E; Osia MA; Jafarzadehpour E; Nouri S
Arch Iran Med; 2012 Apr; 15(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 22424041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trends over time in congenital malformations in live-born children conceived after assisted reproductive technology.
Henningsen AA; Bergh C; Skjaerven R; Tiitinen A; Wennerholm UB; Romundstad LB; Gissler M; Opdahl S; Nyboe Andersen A; Lidegaard Ø; Forman JL; Pinborg A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Jul; 97(7):816-823. PubMed ID: 29572867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Schieve LA; Ferre C; Peterson HB; Macaluso M; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1144-53. PubMed ID: 15172846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Obstetric outcome and incidence of congenital anomalies in 2351 IVF/ICSI babies.
Levi Setti PE; Moioli M; Smeraldi A; Cesaratto E; Menduni F; Livio S; Morenghi E; Patrizio P
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 27116010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects.
Davies MJ; Moore VM; Willson KJ; Van Essen P; Priest K; Scott H; Haan EA; Chan A
N Engl J Med; 2012 May; 366(19):1803-13. PubMed ID: 22559061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies.
Klemetti R; Gissler M; Sevón T; Koivurova S; Ritvanen A; Hemminki E
Fertil Steril; 2005 Nov; 84(5):1300-7. PubMed ID: 16275218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies.
Qin J; Sheng X; Wang H; Liang D; Tan H; Xia J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):777-98. PubMed ID: 25877221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital costs of multiple-birth and singleton-birth children during the first 5 years of life and the role of assisted reproductive technology.
Chambers GM; Hoang VP; Lee E; Hansen M; Sullivan EA; Bower C; Chapman M
JAMA Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 168(11):1045-53. PubMed ID: 25222633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Practitioner reporting of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technology: Does it still have a role in surveillance of birth defects?
Hansen M; Sullivan E; Jequier AM; Burton P; Junk S; Yovich J; Bower C
Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):516-20. PubMed ID: 17021189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China.
Yang X; Li Y; Li C; Zhang W
Fertil Steril; 2014 Feb; 101(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 24269043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004-06.
Cohen B; Bernson D; Sappenfield W; Kirby RS; Kissin D; Zhang Y; Copeland G; Zhang Z; Macaluso M;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2014 May; 28(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 24533655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Retinopathy of prematurity in assisted versus natural conception and singleton versus multiple births.
Friling R; Axer-Siegel R; Hersocovici Z; Weinberger D; Sirota L; Snir M
Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 17270680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
