These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review. Hansen M; Bower C; Milne E; de Klerk N; Kurinczuk JJ Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 15567881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000. Zhang Z; Macaluso M; Cohen B; Schieve L; Nannini A; Chen M; Wright V; Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1657-61. PubMed ID: 20004392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Follow-up of children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies]. Bouillon C; Fauque P Arch Pediatr; 2013 May; 20(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 23545282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The contribution of twins conceived by assisted reproduction technology to the very preterm birth rate: a population-based study. Tul N; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Druskovic M; Novak Z; Blickstein I Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 24169037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Buckett WM; Chian RC; Holzer H; Dean N; Usher R; Tan SL Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 17906024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Birth defects in infants born in 1998-2004 to men and women serving in the U.S. military during the 1990-1991 Gulf War era. Bukowinski AT; DeScisciolo C; Conlin AM; K Ryan MA; Sevick CJ; Smith TC Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Sep; 94(9):721-8. PubMed ID: 22903974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004-2014. Han Y; Luo H; Zhang Y Exp Ther Med; 2018 Oct; 16(4):3179-3185. PubMed ID: 30214541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Are congenital anorectal malformations more frequent in newborns conceived with assisted reproductive techniques? Midrio P; Nogare CD; Di Gianantonio E; Clementi M Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 22(4):576-7. PubMed ID: 16815669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women. De Geyter C; De Geyter M; Steimann S; Zhang H; Holzgreve W Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 16284064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: comparing birth certificate and National ART Surveillance System Data, 2011. Thoma ME; Boulet S; Martin JA; Kissin D Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2014 Dec; 63(8):1-11. PubMed ID: 25493705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The influence of misclassification bias on the reported rates of congenital anomalies on the birth certificates for West Virginia--a consequence of an open-ended query. Li J; Robbins S; Lamm SH Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2013 Mar; 97(3):140-51. PubMed ID: 23450748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of Congenital Abnormalities of Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Techniques versus Infants with Natural Conception in Tehran. Farhangniya M; Dortaj Rabori E; Mozafari Kermani R; Haghdoost AA; Bahrampour A; Bagheri P; A L Lancaster P; Ashrafi M; Vosough Taqi Dizaj A; Gourabi H; Shahzadeh Fazeli A Int J Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 7(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 24520489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred. Dickey RP Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Neurological sequelae in twins born after assisted conception: controlled national cohort study. Pinborg A; Loft A; Schmidt L; Greisen G; Rasmussen S; Andersen AN BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7461):311. PubMed ID: 15256418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Seasonal variations in the incidence of some congenital anomalies in Puerto Rico based on the timing of conception. de la Vega A; López-Cepero R P R Health Sci J; 2009 Jun; 28(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 19530553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproduction technology treatment. Wang YA; Nikravan R; Smith HC; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2554-61. PubMed ID: 23814097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on intra-uterine growth and birth defects in singletons. Hansen M; Bower C Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 19(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 24746981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes? Schieve LA; Rasmussen SA; Buck GM; Schendel DE; Reynolds MA; Wright VC Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 15172847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [A meta-analysis on birth defects in both in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer infants and the naturally conceived children]. Gao W; Shen Y Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 43(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 19950720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]