257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24533762)
1. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Hegarty L; Faulkner A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing.
See RL; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Kliethermes S; Oleson J
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 23442568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of a contralateral hearing aid to perception of consonant voicing, intonation, and emotional state in adult cochlear implantees.
Most T; Gaon-Sivan G; Shpak T; Luntz M
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 22057984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
Mulhern L; Cullington H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
Souza P; Arehart K; Miller CW; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.
van de Velde DJ; Schiller NO; van Heuven VJ; Levelt CC; van Ginkel J; Beers M; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3349. PubMed ID: 28599540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 25099401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
Ren L; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Qin Y; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Wei C; Liu Y
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 34288631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
