These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24534002)

  • 1. Categorisation of protein respiratory allergens: the case of Subtilisin.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 24534002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the potency of respiratory allergens: uncertainties and challenges.
    Basketter DA; Kimber I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 22019813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consideration of criteria required for assignment of a (skin) sensitiser a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation.
    Basketter D; Kimber I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 24893346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trade Union Priority List for REACH authorisation.
    Romano D; Santos T; Gadea R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Jan; 65(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 20508006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining occupational and consumer exposure limits for enzyme protein respiratory allergens under REACH.
    Basketter DA; Broekhuizen C; Fieldsend M; Kirkwood S; Mascarenhas R; Maurer K; Pedersen C; Rodriguez C; Schiff HE
    Toxicology; 2010 Feb; 268(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 20026217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemical allergy: translating biology into hazard characterization.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Mar; 120 Suppl 1():S238-68. PubMed ID: 21097995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision trees for evaluating skin and respiratory sensitizing potential of chemicals in accordance with European regulations.
    Selgrade MK; Sullivan KS; Boyles RR; Dederick E; Serex TL; Loveless SE
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 22584521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemical reactivity measurements: potential for characterization of respiratory chemical allergens.
    Lalko JF; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Sarlo K; Api AM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Mar; 25(2):433-45. PubMed ID: 21092755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semipolar polycyclic aromatic compounds: identification of 15 priority substances and the need for regulatory steps under REACH regulation.
    Schwarz MA; Behnke A; Brandt M; Eisenträger A; Hassauer M; Kalberlah F; Seidel A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):415-28. PubMed ID: 24449130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mechanistic approach to modeling respiratory sensitization.
    Mekenyan O; Patlewicz G; Kuseva C; Popova I; Mehmed A; Kotov S; Zhechev T; Pavlov T; Temelkov S; Roberts DW
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 27(2):219-39. PubMed ID: 24422459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priority setting in the REACH system.
    Hansson SO; Rudén C
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Apr; 90(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 16340010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Workshop overview. Identification of respiratory allergens.
    Kimber I; Bernstein IL; Karol MH; Robinson MK; Sarlo K; Selgrade MK
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1996 Sep; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 8812200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemical sensitization and allergotoxicology.
    Van Den Heuvel RL; Lambrechts N; Verstraelen S; Nelissen IC; Schoeters GE
    Exp Suppl; 2012; 101():289-314. PubMed ID: 22945573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The German REACH Congress 2016: a workshop report.
    Reihlen A; Jepsen D; Broschinski L; Luch A; Schulte A
    Arch Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 92(3):1343-1347. PubMed ID: 29453549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-relationships between different classes of chemical allergens.
    Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Jul; 33(7):558-65. PubMed ID: 22271251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for the identification of chemical respiratory allergens in rodents: comparisons of cytokine profiling with induced changes in serum IgE.
    Dearman RJ; Skinner RA; Humphreys NE; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 12884401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hazard communication of fragrance allergens must be improved.
    Klaschka U
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23325757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time matters: A stock-pollution approach to authorisation decision-making for PBT/vPvB chemicals under REACH.
    Gabbert S; Hilber I
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():236-244. PubMed ID: 27594688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.