256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24534119)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy for breast mass: preoperative predictors of invasive breast cancer.
Park AY; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Yoo M; Kim JA; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 24534119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.
Brennan ME; Turner RM; Ciatto S; Marinovich ML; French JR; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 21493791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision.
Kim J; Han W; Lee JW; You JM; Shin HC; Ahn SK; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Breast; 2012 Oct; 21(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 22749854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Halon A; Matkowski R
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():218. PubMed ID: 26179898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rutstein LA; Johnson RR; Poller WR; Dabbs D; Groblewski J; Rakitt T; Tsung A; Kirchner T; Sumkin J; Keenan D; Soran A; Ahrendt G; Falk JS
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 17461899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underestimation of invasive lesions in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast diagnosed by ultrasound-guided biopsy: a comparison between patients with and without HER2/neu overexpression.
Chang WC; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Ko KH; Peng YJ; Tung HJ; Chang TH; Hsu GC
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun; 83(6):935-941. PubMed ID: 24666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography: Preoperative predictor of the histologic underestimation of US-guided core needle breast biopsy.
Park AY; Son EJ; Kim JA; Han K; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2509-14. PubMed ID: 26467705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic lesion size of ductal carcinoma in situ as a preoperative predictor for the presence of an invasive focus.
Lee JW; Han W; Ko E; Cho J; Kim EK; Jung SY; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul; 98(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 18459155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: clinical and US features predictive of upgrade to malignancy.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Park BW; Kim SI
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 20971773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of treatment with mastectomy, use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and upstaging to invasive cancer in patients diagnosed with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy.
Chin-Lenn L; Mack LA; Temple W; Cherniak W; Quinn RR; Ravani P; Lewin AM; Quan ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 24046105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of invasion in patients with core-needle biopsy-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ.
Huo L; Sneige N; Hunt KK; Albarracin CT; Lopez A; Resetkova E
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 107(8):1760-8. PubMed ID: 16977650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
Darling ML; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin C; Selland DL; Denison CM; DiPiro PJ; Rose DI; Rhei E; Meyer JE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 11044038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesions diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy: Can shearwave elastography predict histologic upgrade after surgery or vaccuum assisted excision?
Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():150-155. PubMed ID: 29524785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?
Foster MC; Helvie MA; Gregory NE; Rebner M; Nees AV; Paramagul C
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):813-9. PubMed ID: 15105449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
