These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24536228)

  • 1. A new coefficient; application to biserial correlation and to estimation of selective efficiency.
    BROGDEN HE
    Psychometrika; 1949 Sep; 14(3):169-82. PubMed ID: 24536228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the biserial correlation and its sampling variance for use in meta-analysis.
    Jacobs P; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):161-180. PubMed ID: 27631635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphical method for the rapid calculation of biserial and point biserial correlation in test research.
    GOHEEN HW; DAVIDOFF MD
    Psychometrika; 1951 Jun; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 14844563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A short note on the maximal point-biserial correlation under non-normality.
    Cheng Y; Liu H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):344-351. PubMed ID: 27458986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple correlation coefficient.
    Nijsse M
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):341. PubMed ID: 2049509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The recognition and estimation of cyclic trends.
    EDWARDS JH
    Ann Hum Genet; 1961 May; 25():83-7. PubMed ID: 13725808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.
    Bonett DG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():113-144. PubMed ID: 31565811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical behavioristics and sequences of responses.
    MILLER GA; FRICK FC
    Psychol Rev; 1949 Nov; 56(6):311-24. PubMed ID: 15392590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number".
    COCHRAN WG
    Biometrics; 1950 Jun; 6(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15420239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of grouping in the estimation of biologic variations].
    HRUBY K
    Biol Listy; 1950 May; 31(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15426635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methods of estimation and tests in multinomial distributions, with application to the data of Taillard and Prader concerning intersexuality].
    KAELIN A
    J Genet Hum; 1959 Aug; 8():134-60. PubMed ID: 14408351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS].
    GROEN M; GEMERT W
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1963 Nov; 18():467-80. PubMed ID: 14099172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The estimation from individual records of the relationship between dose and quantal response.
    FINNEY DJ
    Biometrika; 1947; 34(Pt 3-4):320-34. PubMed ID: 18918700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ALPHA FACTOR ANALYSIS.
    KAISER HF; CAFFREY J
    Psychometrika; 1965 Mar; 30():1-14. PubMed ID: 14293189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [THE SELECTION OF THE ADEQUATE MEAN SQUARE AS AN ERROR TERM IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE].
    VAN DER MEER HC
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1964; 19():484-96. PubMed ID: 14228906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [DESCRIPTION THROUGH PREDICTION].
    GROEN M
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1963 Jul; 18():341-4. PubMed ID: 14049685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A COMPARISON OF THE DOOLITTLE AND SQUARE ROOT METHODS].
    HAZEWINKEL A
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1963 Sep; 18():382-95. PubMed ID: 14093206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. F AND T TESTS RELATIVE TO ONE- AND TWO-TAILED TESTS.
    GAITO J
    J Gen Psychol; 1964 Jul; 71():131-4. PubMed ID: 14183367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the accuracy of efficiency of estimating equation approach.
    Sutradhar BC; Das K
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):622-5. PubMed ID: 10877326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two procedures for calculating discriminant function coefficients.
    SCHMID J
    Psychometrika; 1950 Dec; 15(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 14797909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.