212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24547680)
1. Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: an initial meta-analysis.
Katz J; Moore J
Violence Vict; 2013; 28(6):1054-67. PubMed ID: 24547680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses.
Coker AL; Cook-Craig PG; Williams CM; Fisher BS; Clear ER; Garcia LS; Hegge LM
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):777-96. PubMed ID: 21642269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Sexual Assault-Specific Prosocial Bystander Behavior and Intentions: A Prospective Analysis.
Austin MJ; Dardis CM; Wilson MS; Gidycz CA; Berkowitz AD
Violence Against Women; 2016 Jan; 22(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 26303402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses.
Coker AL; Fisher BS; Bush HM; Swan SC; Williams CM; Clear ER; DeGue S
Violence Against Women; 2015 Dec; 21(12):1507-27. PubMed ID: 25125493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rehearsing for real life: the impact of the InterACT Sexual Assault Prevention Program on self-reported likelihood of engaging in bystander interventions.
Ahrens CE; Rich MD; Ullman JB
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):760-76. PubMed ID: 21628338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender differences in attitudes and beliefs associated with bystander behavior and sexual assault.
Amar AF; Sutherland M; Laughon K
J Forensic Nurs; 2014; 10(2):84-91; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 24762431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus.
Cares AC; Banyard VL; Moynihan MM; Williams LM; Potter SJ; Stapleton JG
Violence Against Women; 2015 Feb; 21(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 25540255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus.
Peterson K; Sharps P; Banyard V; Powers RA; Kaukinen C; Gross D; Decker MR; Baatz C; Campbell J
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(23):3630-3655. PubMed ID: 26976433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Men's Program: does it impact college men's self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene?
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Foubert JD; Brasfield HM; Hill B; Shelley-Tremblay S
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):743-59. PubMed ID: 21571743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications for sexual assault prevention: college students as prosocial bystanders.
Exner D; Cummings N
J Am Coll Health; 2011; 59(7):655-7. PubMed ID: 21823961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a bystander education program.
Amar AF; Sutherland M; Kesler E
Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Dec; 33(12):851-7. PubMed ID: 23215986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bystander perceptions: implications for university sexual assault prevention programs.
Koelsch LE; Brown AL; Boisen L
Violence Vict; 2012; 27(4):563-79. PubMed ID: 22978075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Students as Prosocial Bystanders to Sexual Assault: Demographic Correlates of Intervention Norms, Intentions, and Missed Opportunities.
Hoxmeier JC; Acock AC; Flay BR
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Feb; 35(3-4):731-754. PubMed ID: 29294634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of the men's program on U.S. Army soldiers' intentions to commit and willingness to intervene to prevent rape: a pretest posttest study.
Foubert JD; Masin RC
Violence Vict; 2012; 27(6):911-21. PubMed ID: 23393953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program.
Gidycz CA; Orchowski LM; Berkowitz AD
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):720-42. PubMed ID: 21571742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sisterhood may be powerful for reducing sexual and intimate partner violence: an evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander in-person program with sorority members.
Moynihan MM; Banyard VL; Arnold JS; Eckstein RP; Stapleton JG
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):703-19. PubMed ID: 21628337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preventing Interpersonal Violence on College Campuses: The Effect of One Act Training on Bystander Intervention.
Alegría-Flores K; Raker K; Pleasants RK; Weaver MA; Weinberger M
J Interpers Violence; 2017 Apr; 32(7):1103-1126. PubMed ID: 26002875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of RISE: A Sexual Violence Prevention Program for Female College Students in India.
Nieder C; Bosch JF; Nockemann AP; Kärtner J
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Apr; 37(7-8):NP5538-NP5565. PubMed ID: 32954942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bystander Intervention Among College Men: The Role of Alcohol and Correlates of Sexual Aggression.
Orchowski LM; Berkowitz A; Boggis J; Oesterle D
J Interpers Violence; 2016 Oct; 31(17):2824-46. PubMed ID: 25944836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond the Situational Model: Bystander Action Consequences to Intervening in Situations Involving Sexual Violence.
Moschella EA; Bennett S; Banyard VL
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Oct; 33(20):3211-3231. PubMed ID: 26940350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
