These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24548323)

  • 1. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A negative effect of repetition in episodic memory.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1786-91. PubMed ID: 22545610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural enhancement and attenuation induced by repetitive recall.
    Hashimoto T; Usui N; Taira M; Kojima S
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 96(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 21492743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative testing effect.
    Rawson KA; Wissman KT; Vaughn KE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1326-36. PubMed ID: 25961357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
    Cousins R; Hanley JR
    Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reminding effect: presentation of associates enhances memory for related words in a list.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1526-40. PubMed ID: 24635185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
    Herlitz A; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adults' word recall and word repetition.
    Kynette D; Kemper S; Norman S; Cheung HT
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 2090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):859-71. PubMed ID: 25181496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recalled aspects of original encoding strategies influence episodic feelings of knowing.
    Hertzog C; Fulton EK; Sinclair SM; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):126-40. PubMed ID: 23835601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can helping hurt? Effects of constraining and nonconstraining retrieval cue on list transfer by mentally retarded adolescents.
    Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Nov; 85(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 7446600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of cue-target uniqueness on cued recall performance.
    Stein B
    Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24202901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary.
    Wahlheim CN; Maddox GB; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 23937236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.